切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 387 -392. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.06.006

所属专题： 文献；

论著

主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂中的应用价值
周晓茜1, 马晓烨1, 杨智蕴1, 李凤1, 蔡英1,†()   
  1. 1. 200123　上海，同济大学附属东方医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-26 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 蔡英
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点学科群建设项目(PWZxq2017-05)

Value of intra-aortic balloon pump in ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction

Xiaoqian Zhou1, Xiaoye Ma1, Zhiyun Yang1, Feng Li1, Ying Cai1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200123, China
  • Received:2018-07-26 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cai Ying, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

周晓茜, 马晓烨, 杨智蕴, 李凤, 蔡英. 主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂中的应用价值[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(06): 387-392.

Xiaoqian Zhou, Xiaoye Ma, Zhiyun Yang, Feng Li, Ying Cai. Value of intra-aortic balloon pump in ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(06): 387-392.

目的

探讨主动脉内球囊反搏（IABP）在急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者中的应用价值。

方法

选取上海同济大学附属东方医院心内科2008年1月至2016年12月共收治入院的急性心肌梗死合并室间隔破裂患者10例，分为IABP组和药物组，每组各5例。两组患者均给予多巴胺、硝酸甘油、呋塞米、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷等药物治疗，IABP组患者在药物治疗的基础上早期植入IABP。对两组患者的一般资料、既往病史、心肌梗死特点、心功能、循环以及尿量等进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较两组患者的生存情况。

结果

药物组患者胸痛时间[（153 ± 67）h vs.（34 ± 13）h]较IABP组显著延长（t = 1.591，P = 0.023）。治疗后，IABP组和药物组患者平均动脉压[（76 ± 7）mmHg vs.（66 ± 5）mmHg]及尿量[（42 ± 15）mL / h vs.（23 ± 8）mL / h]比较，差异均有统计学意义（t = 2.620、2.551，P = 0.031、0.034）。生存曲线结果显示，IABP组患者的生存情况显著优于药物组（χ2 = 280.400，P = 0.041）。

结论

在急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者早期使用IABP可以显著改善患者的血压以及尿量，稳定患者血流动力学，为手术争取时间，从而降低病死率，是手术前重要的过渡手段。

关键词: 主动脉内球囊反搏, 急性心肌梗死, 室间隔破裂
Objective

To evaluate the value of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2016, 10 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular septal rupture admitted to the Department of Cardiology, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University were selected, which were divided into the IABP group and drug group with 5 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with dopamine, nitroglycerin, furosemide, aspirin, clopidogrel, while patients in the IABP group were implanted with IABP on the basis of drug therapy. The general data, past history, myocardial infarction characteristics, cardiac function, circulation and urine volume were compared between these two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the survival in these two groups.

Results

The time of chest pain in the drug group [(153 ± 67) h vs. (34 ± 13) h] was significantly longer than that in the IABP group (t = 1.591, P = 0.023). After treatment, the mean arterial pressure [(76 ± 7) mmHg vs. (66 ± 5) mmHg] and urine volume [(42 ± 15) mL / h vs. (23 ± 8) mL / h] in the IABP group and drug group were significantly different (t = 2.620, 2.551; P = 0.031, 0.034). The survival curve showed that the survival condition of IABP group was significantly better than that of drug group (χ2 = 280.400, P = 0.041).

Conclusions

Early use of IABP in patients with ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction can significantly improve their blood pressure and urine volume, stabilize hemodynamics, gain time for operation and thus reduce mortality. It is an important transitional method before operation.

Key words: Intra-aortic balloon pump, Acute myocardial infarction, Ventricular septum rupture
表1 两组急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者心肌梗死特点比较（ ± s）
组别 例数 胸痛时间(h) TNT(mmol/ L) 室壁瘤[例(%)] 前壁心肌梗死[例(%)] 下壁心肌梗死[例(%)] 左前降支病变[例(%)] 左前降支狭窄程度(%)
IABP组 5 34 ± 13 5.0 ± 2.6 2(40.0) 5(100.0) 1(20.0) 4(80.0) 99.5 ± 0.5
药物组 5 153 ± 67 5.4 ± 1.1 1(20.0) 3(60.0) 2(40.0) 2(40.0) 99.8 ± 0.4
t/χ2值 ? 1.591 0.113 4.240 1.000 1.000 1.195 1.464
P值 ? 0.023 0.913 0.685 0.347 0.347 0.286 0.203
图1 两组急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者的生存曲线图
1
周发展，武君，张春玲，等. 替罗非班应用于急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性心肌梗死患者心肌灌注和内皮功能的影响[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志（电子版），2016，9(1): 3-8.
2
Lafci B, Yakut N, Goktogan T, et al. Repair of post-infarct ventricular septal rupture with an infarct-exclusion technique: early results[J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2006, 9 (4): E737-E740.
3
李传保，陈玉国. 主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死患者中的应用进展[J]. 中华心血管病杂志，2016，44(4): 361-363.
4
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126 (16): 2020-2035.
5
Crenshaw BS, Granger CB, Birnbaum Y, et al. Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Trial Investigators[J]. Circulation, 2000, 101 (1): 27-32.
6
Poulsen SH, Praestholm M, Munk K, et al. Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: clinical characteristics and contemporary outcome[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 85 (5): 1591-1596.
7
Jeppsson A, Liden H, Johnsson P, et al. Surgical repair of post infarction ventricular septal defects: a national experience[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005, 27 (2): 216-221.
8
Prêtre R, Ye Q, Grünenfelder J, et al. Operative results of "repair" of ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infraction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84 (7): 785-788.
9
Yip HK, Fang CY, Tsai KT, et al. The potential impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chest, 2004, 125 (5): 1622-1628.
10
Radford MJ, Johnson RA, Daggett WM Jr, et al. Ventricular septal rupture: a review of clinical and physiologic features and an analysis of survival[J]. Circulation, 1981, 64 (3): 545-553.
11
Jones BM, Kapadia SR, Smedira NG, et al. Venricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: a contemporary review[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35 (31): 2060-2068.
12
Papalexopoulou N, Young CP, Attia RQ. What is the best timing of surgery in patients with post-infarct ventricular septal rupture[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2013, 16 (2): 193-196.
13
Abu-Omar Y, Bhinda P, Choong CK, et al. Survival after surgical repair of ischemic ventricular septal rupture[J]. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2012, 20 (4): 404-408.
14
Koh AS, Loh YJ, Lim YP, et al. Ventricular septal rupture following acute myocardial infarction[J]. Acta Cardiol, 2011, 66 (2): 225-230.
15
Morillon-Lutun S, Maucort-Boulch D, Mewton N, et al. Therapeutic management changes and mortality rates over 30 years in ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 112 (9): 1273-1278.
16
Topaz O, Taylor AL. Interventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: from pathophysiologic features to the role of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic modalities in current management[J]. Am J Med, 1992, 93 (6): 683-688.
17
Lemery R, Smith HC, Giuliani ER, et al. Prognosis in rupture of the ventricular septum after acute myocardial infarction and role of early surgical intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1992, 70 (2): 147-151.
18
胡小莹. 急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔患者的临床特点及近期预后因素分析[D]. 北京：北京协和医学院，2013.
19
邹榕江，徐根兴，胡振雷，等. 急性心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔外科手术时机探讨[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志，2015，31(4): 244.
20
O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 82 (1): E1-E27.
21
高志伟，赵红梅，黄英姿，等. 主动脉内球囊反搏对急性心肌梗死患者短期和远期预后影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志，2017，26(1): 102-107.
22
中国心脏重症主动脉内球囊反搏治疗专家委员会. 主动脉内球囊反搏心脏外科围手术期应用共识[J]. 中华医学杂志，2017，97(28): 2168-2175.
23
Prondzinsky R, Unverzagt S, Russ M, et al. Hemo-dynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial[J]. Shock, 2012, 37 (4): 378-384.
24
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367 (14): 1287-1296.
25
Sjauw KD, Engstrom AE, Vis MM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines[J]. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30 (4): 459-468.
26
Ahmad Y, Sen S, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2015, 175 (6): 931-939.
27
Iqbal MB, Robinson SD, Ding L, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11 (2): e0148931.
28
吴娜琼，高展，郑杨，等. 中国急性心肌梗死患者主动脉内球囊反搏应用现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华心血管病杂志，2018，46(1): 26-31.
29
Sai-Sudhakar CB, Firstenberg MS, Sun B. Biventricular mechanical assist for complex, acute post-infarction ventricular septal defect[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006, 132 (5): 1238-1239.
30
沈菲，苏晞，刘成伟，等. 心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔的临床特征及近期预后分析[J]. 中国心血管病研究，2013，11(3): 194-196.
31
潘宏伟，郭莹，郑昭芬，等. 主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死并泵衰竭患者不同时机的应用[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志，2014，22(1): 65-68.
32
方臻飞，黄亿源，胡信群，等. 主动脉内球囊反搏抢救急性心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔患者的疗效分析[J]. 中国急救医学，2014，34(2): 149-152.
[1] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[2] 缪黄泰, 李潇颖, 张明, 聂绍平. 急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者院内死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 187-192.
[3] 陈娇, 王立伟, 孙斌, 张萌, 刘倩, 周美艳, 丁文平, 张伟. 体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏在暴发性心肌炎救治中的应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 6-12.
[4] 郑珊珊, 郑哲, 黄洁, 廖中凯, 宋云虎, 房晓楠, 刘盛. 主动脉内球囊反搏作为心脏移植桥接治疗对晚期心力衰竭合并肺动脉高压患者的疗效[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 277-284.
[5] 乔梁, 杨向群. 脂肪干细胞在心肌损伤修复中的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 230-236.
[6] 谢靖芸, 李准. 院前急救对AMI患者治疗及预后影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 869-875.
[7] 阿拉腾宝力德, 李淑娟. 直接支架植入在血栓高负荷急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的临床疗效[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(09): 674-679.
[8] 赵宁, 陈娟媚, 杨其霖, 莫沛. 急性心肌梗死患者住院病死率和纤维蛋白原水平的非线性关系[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 32-37.
[9] 左汉恒, 李银平, 张程征, 朱文雅. 酷似扩张型心肌病的急性心肌梗死诊断特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 88-93.
[10] 杨沭, 郦明芳, 陈明龙. 左心室血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 188-192.
[11] 张林叶, 柏战, 王宗方, 潘文君. GRACE 2.0评分对老年急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 6-11.
[12] 杜新丽, 李秀珍, 张玥, 姜磊, 谭晓. 中老年急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后急性肾损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 25-27.
[13] 祁春雷, 翁川晴, 刘念念, 王信淳, 苏俊伟, 肖平喜. Takotsubo综合征患者系统氧化应激与心脏功能相关性研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 134-140.
[14] 魏盈盈, 潘鑫, 李岑, 曹俊辉, 顾慧, 王忻, 杨声远. 基于胸痛中心急救流程在急性心肌梗死患者救治中的应用[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 86-88.
[15] 何偲, 鄢华. 妊娠期缺血性心脏病的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 263-266.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号