切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 187 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2023.03.002

论著

急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者院内死亡的危险因素分析
缪黄泰, 李潇颖, 张明, 聂绍平()   
  1. 100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内冠心病中心
    100035 北京,北京积水潭医院北京大学第四临床医学院干部保健科
    071000 河北保定,保定市第一中心医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-20 出版日期:2023-06-30
  • 通信作者: 聂绍平
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2004800); 北京市医院管理局"登峰"人才计划项目(DFL20180601); 北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PZ2022004)

Risk factors of hospital death in patients with heart rupture after acute myocardial infarction

Huangtai Miao, Xiaoying Li, Ming Zhang, Shaoping Nie()   

  1. Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Division of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
    Department of Cadre Health Care, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China
    Department of Cardiology, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2022-08-20 Published:2023-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Shaoping Nie
引用本文:

缪黄泰, 李潇颖, 张明, 聂绍平. 急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者院内死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 187-192.

Huangtai Miao, Xiaoying Li, Ming Zhang, Shaoping Nie. Risk factors of hospital death in patients with heart rupture after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(03): 187-192.

目的

分析急性心肌梗死并发心脏破裂患者院内死亡的危险因素及临床特征。

方法

选择北京安贞医院、北京积水潭医院和保定市第一中心医院2010年1月至2018年12月确诊为急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂的189例患者,根据院内存活与死亡情况,将其分为死亡组(123例)和存活组(66例)。比较两组患者的临床资料,并采用logistic回归分析探讨急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者死亡的危险因素。

结果

两组患者年龄、白细胞计数、血小板计数、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、空腹血糖、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、肌钙蛋白I、游离壁破裂、左室舒张末期内径> 60 mm及是否室壁瘤形成比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均< 0.05)。入院后的治疗方面,两组患者阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路移植术和心包穿刺术比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均< 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,天冬氨酸氨基转移酶[比值比(OR)= 1.012,95%置信区间(CI)(1.004,1.020),P = 0.002]、空腹血糖[OR = 1.214,95%CI(1.001,1.473),P = 0.049]和游离壁破裂[OR = 9.117,95%CI(1.730,48.050),P = 0.009]是急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者死亡的危险因素,而白细胞计数[OR = 0.792,95%CI(0.683,0.919),P = 0.002]、左室舒张末期内径> 60 mm[OR = 0.152,95%CI(0.028,0.831),P = 0.030]、室壁瘤形成[OR = 0.271,95%CI(0.086,0.856),P = 0.026]、使用阿司匹林[OR = 0.185,95%CI(0.047,0.735),P = 0.016]是其保护因素。

结论

急性心肌梗死合并心脏破裂患者病死率高,使用阿司匹林可能会降低心脏破裂患者的病死率。

Objective

To analyze risk factors and clinical characteristics of in-hospital death in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiac rupture.

Methods

A total of 189 patients with heart rupture after acute myocardial infarction were collected from Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital and Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018. According to their living status in the hospital, the above patients were divided into a death group (n = 123) and a survival group (n = 66). The clinical data of the two groups were compared, and logistic regression analysis was used to explore the mortality risk factors in patients with cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction.

Results

There were significant differences in age, leukocytes, platelets, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, troponin I, free wall rupture rate, left ventricular end diastolic diameter > 60 mm and ventricular aneurysm formation rate between the two groups (all P < 0.05). In terms of treatment after admission, there were significant differences in aspirin, beta-blockers, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and pericardiocentesis between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that aspartate aminotransferase [odds ratio (OR) = 1.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.004, 1.020), P = 0.002], fasting blood glucose [OR = 1.214, 95%CI (1.001, 1.473), P = 0.049] and free wall rupture [OR = 9.117, 95%CI (1.730, 48.050), P = 0.009] were independent risk factors for death in patients with cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction, while leukocytes [OR = 0.792, 95%CI (0.683, 0.919), P = 0.002], left ventricular end diastolic diameter > 60 mm [OR = 0.152, 95%CI (0.028, 0.831), P = 0.030], ventricular aneurysm formation [OR = 0.271, 95%CI (0.086, 0.856), P = 0.026] and aspirin use [OR = 0.185, 95%CI (0.047, 0.735), P = 0.016] were independent protective factors.

Conclusion

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiac rupture have a high mortality rate, and the use of aspirin may reduce their mortality.

表1 两组急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的基线资料比较[例(%)]
表2 两组急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的血液学指标比较[MP25P75)]
表3 两组急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的心肌梗死相关指标比较[例(%)]
表4 两组急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的住院用药及手术治疗比较[例(%)]
表5 心脏破裂患者死亡危险因素的logistic回归分析
1
Calvert PA, Cockburn J, Wynne D, et al. Percutaneous closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect: in-hospital outcomes and long-term follow-up of UK experience[J]. Circulation, 2014, 129 (23): 2395-2402.
2
Arnaoutakis GJ, Zhao Y, George TJ, et al. Surgical repair of ventricular septal defect after myocardial infarction: outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 94 (2): 436-443, 443-444.
3
张强,程铖,徐日新,等.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后微循环障碍的预测价值[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)202013(5):351-355.
4
Shoji K, Yanishi K, Kawamata H, et al. New risk factors for early- and late-onset cardiac rupture in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. J Cardiol, 2022, 79 (3): 400-407.
5
French JK, Hellkamp AS, Armstrong PW, et al. Mechanical complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from APEX-AMI)[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2010, 105 (1): 59-63.
6
Figueras J, Alcalde O, Barrabés JA, et al. Changes in hospital mortality rates in 425 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiac rupture over a 30-year period[J]. Circulation, 2008, 118 (25): 2783-2789.
7
Honda S, Asaumi Y, Yamane T, et al. Trends in the clinical and pathological characteristics of cardiac rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction over 35 years[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014, 3 (5): e000984.
8
Liebelt JJ, Yang Y, DeRose JJ, et al. Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction in the modern era with mechanical circulatory support: a single center observational study[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Dis, 2016, 6 (1): 10-16.
9
Ipek G, Onuk T, Karatas MB, et al. Relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and left ventricular free wall rupture in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Cardiology, 2015, 132 (2): 105-110.
10
Nozoe M, Sakamoto T, Taguchi E, et al. Clinical manifestation of early phase left ventricular rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction in the primary PCI era[J]. J Cardiol, 2014, 63 (1): 14-18.
11
Matteucci M, Fina D, Jiritano F, et al. Treatment strategies for post-infarction left ventricular free-wall rupture[J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2019, 8 (4): 379-387.
12
Ikeda M, Ide T, Furusawa S, et al. Heart rate reduction with ivabradine prevents cardiac rupture after myocardial infarction in mice[J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2022, 36 (2): 257-262.
13
Pradhan A, Jain N, Cassese S, et al. Incidence and predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction[J]. Heart Asia, 2018, 10 (2): e11062.
14
Sulzgruber P, El-Hamid F, Koller L, et al. Long-term outcome and risk prediction in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction complicated by post-infarction cardiac rupture[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017 (227): 399-403.
15
Thiele H, Kaulfersch C, Daehnert I, et al. Immediate primary transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects[J]. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30 (1): 81-88.
16
Tai S, Tang JJ, Tang L, et al. Management and outcome of ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: what is new in the era of percutaneous intervention?[J]. Cardiology, 2018, 141 (4): 226-232.
17
Xue X, Kan J, Zhang JJ, et al. Comparison in pre-valence, predictors, and clinical outcome of VSR versus FWR after acute myocardial infarction: the prospective, multicenter registry MOODY trial-heart rupture analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2019, 20 (12): 1158-1164.
18
Ikeda M, Ide T, Tadokoro T, et al. Excessive hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression induces cardiac rupture via p53-dependent apoptosis after myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2021, 10 (17): e20895.
[1] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[2] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[3] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[4] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[7] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[8] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[9] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
[10] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[11] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[12] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[13] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[14] 邓世栋, 刘凌志, 郭大勇, 王超, 黄忠欣, 张晖辉. 沉默SNHG1基因对膀胱癌细胞增殖、凋亡、迁移和铁死亡的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 804-811.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要