Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01): 41-48. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.01.007

Special Issue:

• Meta-Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of parenteral glutamine supplementation on clinical outcomes in critical ill patients: a meta-analysis

Xiaowei He1, Sheng Lu1, Tao Zhong2, Wei Xu3, Bing Yan1, Feilian Wu1, Li Qiu1, Yu He4, Kankai Tang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
    2. Department of Pharmacy, Zhebei Mingzhou Hospital, Huzhou 313000, China
    3. Department of Intensive Care Unit, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
    4. College of pharmacy, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
  • Received:2017-04-13 Online:2018-02-01 Published:2018-02-01
  • Contact: Kankai Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Kankai, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the immunonutrition function and clinical outcomes of glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition treatment on critically ill patients.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials which focused on clinical outcomes (like the mortality, the infection rate and the length of stay) of converntional parenteral nutrition treatment (the control group) and glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition treatment (the glutamine group) on critically ill patients were systematically retrieved from Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CNKI database, CQVIP database, Wan Fang database and CMB databases from their inception to December 2016. Included articles were independently screened, extracted and evaluated by two reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then conducted the meta-analysis by RevMan 5.2.0.

Results

A total of 1 708 patients in 18 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the hospital mortality in the glutamine group was much lower than that in the control group [RR=0.63, 95%CI (0.47, 0.84), Z=3.16, P=0.002]. However, there were no significant differences in the ICU mortality [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.83, 1.22), Z=0.04, P=0.97], 6-month mortality [RR=0.95, 95%CI (0.67, 1.34), Z=0.29, P=0.77], pulmonary infection [RR=0.91, 95%CI (0.62, 1.32), Z=0.52, P=0.61], urinary tract infection [RR=0.79, 95%CI (0.37, 1.67), Z=0.62, P=0.54], bacteremia [RR=0.52, 95%CI (0.21, 1.33), Z=1.36, P=0.18], catheter-related infection [RR=0.69, 95%CI (0.32, 1.49), Z=0.95, P=0.34], and other infections [RR=0.94, 95%CI (0.80, 1.10), Z=0.81, P=0.42] between the two groups. The hospital length of stay[WMD=-0.26, 95%CI (-3.81, 3.28), Z=0.15, P=0.88] and ICU length of stay [WMD=-1.04, 95%CI (3.95, 1.87), Z=0.70, P=0.48] also showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

Parenteral glutamine supplementation can not improve the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.

Key words: Glutamine, Parenteral nutrition, Meta-analysis, Critically ill

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0571-87236467 E-mail: zhwzzyxzz@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd