切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 111 -115. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2023.02.004

论著

重度烧伤患者伤后应激障碍发生的随访研究
贺肖洁(), 郑磊磊, 岑航辉, 韩春茂   
  1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院健康管理中心;310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院烧伤科
    310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院精神科
    310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-08 出版日期:2023-04-30
  • 通信作者: 贺肖洁
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LGF20H150004); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(N2009A105)

A follow-up study of post-traumatic stress disorder in severe burn patients

Xiaojie He(), Leilei Zheng, Hanghui Cen, Chunmao Han   

  1. Health Management Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China; Department of Burns, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
    Department of Psychiatry, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
    Department of Burns, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2022-12-08 Published:2023-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojie He
引用本文:

贺肖洁, 郑磊磊, 岑航辉, 韩春茂. 重度烧伤患者伤后应激障碍发生的随访研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 111-115.

Xiaojie He, Leilei Zheng, Hanghui Cen, Chunmao Han. A follow-up study of post-traumatic stress disorder in severe burn patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(02): 111-115.

目的

探讨重度烧伤患者伤后应激障碍的发生情况。

方法

以2010年4月至2011年6月间浙江大学医学院附属第二医院烧伤科收治的27例重度烧伤患者为研究对象,创面治疗和心理疏导同步。分别于伤后1个月和伤后1年,对患者进行症状自评量表(SCL-90)、艾森克人格测验(EPQ)、事件影响量表-修订版(IES-R)测评,判定患者是否存在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。

结果

27例重度烧伤患者均被诊断为急性应激障碍,所有患者伤后1个月SCL-90的躯体化评分高于国内常模[(1.66 ± 0.46)分vs.(1.37 ± 0.48)分,t = 3.112,P = 0.002],人际关系敏感评分低于国内常模[(1.35 ± 0.26)分vs.(1.65 ± 0.61)分,t = 2.550,P = 0.011],其他因子与国内常模比较差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。完成1年随访的10例患者中,与伤后1个月比较,各因子间评分差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05);且IES-R测评显示,没有患者达到PTSD阳性筛查标准,其中2例为亚临床创伤后应激反应症状,7例为轻度创伤后应激反应症状,1例为中度创伤后应激反应症状。

结论

重度烧伤患者存在急性应激障碍和创伤后应激反应症状,早期进行心理疏导和药物干预值得探索。

Objective

To study the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with severe burns.

Methods

A total of 27 patients with severe burns admitted to the Department of Burns in the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine from April 2010 to June 2011 were selected as the research objects. Wound treatment and psychological counseling were carried out simultaneously. Symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90), Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ) and impact of event scale-revised (IES-R) were used to evaluate patients with PTSD on one month and one year after injury.

Results

A total of 27 severe burn patients were diagnosed with acute stress disorder. In the SCL-90, the somatization score of 27 severe burn patients on one month after injury was higher than that of the national norm [(1.66 ± 0.46) vs. (1.37 ± 0.48), t = 3.112, P = 0.002], the interpersonal sensitivity score was lower [(1.35 ± 0.26) vs. (1.65 ± 0.61), t = 2.550, P = 0.011], and there were no significant differences between other factors and the domestic norms (all P > 0.05). In the 10 patients who completed one-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in scores among all factors compared with one month after injury (all P > 0.05). In addition, the IES-R indicated that no patient met the positive screening criteria for PTSD, including two patients of subclinical post-traumatic stress symptoms, seven patients of mild post-traumatic stress symptoms and one patient of moderate post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Conclusion

Severe burn patients have acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress symptoms, and early psychological counseling and drug intervention are worth exploring.

表1 伤后1个月烧伤患者SCL-90各因子评分与国内常模的比较( ± s
表2 伤后1个月和伤后1年烧伤患者SCL-90各因子评分的比较( ± s
1
Lodha P, Shah B, Karia S, et al. Post-Traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following burn injuries: a comprehensive clinical review[J]. Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 2020, 33 (4): 276-287.
2
Huang YK, Su YJ. Burn severity and long-term psychosocial adjustment after burn injury: the mediating role of body image dissatisfaction[J]. Burns, 2021, 47 (6): 1373-1380.
3
Martin L, Byrnes M, Mcgarry S, et al. Evaluation of the posttraumatic growth inventory after severe burn injury in Western Austra1ia: clinical implications for use[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2016, 38 (24): 2398-2405.
4
Paggiaro AO, Paggiaro PBS, Fernandes RAQ, et al. P-osttraumatic stress disorder in burn patient: a systematic review[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2022, 75 (5): 1586-1595.
5
金华,吴文源,张明园.中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志198612(5):260-263.
6
柴家科.实用烧伤外科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2014:134.
7
王征宇.症状自评量表(SCL-90)[J].上海精神医学1984(2):68-70.
8
Weiss DS, Marmar CR. The impact of event scale-revised[M]. // Wilson JP, Keane TM. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press, 1997.
9
吴坎坎,张雨青,Chen Peter Tianzhi.灾后民众创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与事件冲击量表(IES)的发展和应用[J].心理科学进展200917(3):495-498.
10
李文姬,李嘉,马兰兰,等.乳腺癌住院患者创伤后应激障碍相关因素分析及护理对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志2015(12):1-3.
11
McLarnon MJW, Romero EF. Cross-cultural equivalence of shortened versions of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: an application of the alignment method[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2020 (163): 110074.
12
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research[R]. Geneva, WHO, 1992.
13
朱威,徐佳,陆远强.《2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南》成人生命支持部分建议内容分析[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)202013(5):379-381.
14
Wei Y, Li H, Wang H, et al. Psychological status of volunteers in a phase Ⅰ clinical trial assessed by symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ)[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018 (24): 4968-4973.
15
Simmons C, Waldrop J, Penny E. Screening for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with burns[J]. J Nurse Pract, 2022, 18 (1): 101-106.
16
孙继伟,李佳欢,王艳荣,等.烧伤康复期患者神经质人格、心理弹性与创伤后应激障碍症状和创伤后成长之间的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志201933(3):198-202.
17
Sveen J, Orwelius L, Gerdin B, et al. Psychometric properties of the impact of event scale-revised in patients one year after burn injury[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2010, 31 (2): 310-318.
18
Zheng H, Wu K, Zhou Y, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of posttraumatic stress disorder in Chinese burn patients and their family members[J]. Burns, 2021, 47 (5): 1102-1109.
19
贺肖洁,郑磊磊,岑航辉.重度烧伤合并精神障碍的救治及心理追踪一例[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)20158(1):63-65.
20
Noda Y, Asano K, Shimizu E, et al. Assessing subgroup differences in posttraumatic stress disorder among rescue workers in Japan with the impact of event scale-revised[J]. Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 2019, 13 (2): 309-318.
[1] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[2] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[3] 林同辉, 杨卫玺. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣在电烧伤治疗中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 526-530.
[4] 王宏宇, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 陈强, 闫增强. 亲属头皮加自体头皮混合移植接力在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 554-554.
[5] 张嘉炜, 王瑞, 张克诚, 易磊, 周增丁. 烧烫伤创面深度智能检测模型P-YOLO的建立及测试效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 379-385.
[6] 毛书雷, 张元海, 王杰, 倪良方, 王新刚, 邹雁, 王荣娟, 吴军梅, 张建芬. 区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 386-392.
[7] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[8] 杨新园, 王淑君, 何成, 宋喜鹤, 刘丽芸. 预防与处理危重烧伤患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管堵塞的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 443-446.
[9] 孙勇, 彭曦. 重视烧伤创面愈合中的葡萄糖代谢以优化营养治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 277-281.
[10] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[11] 温春泉, 陈欣, 尹凯, 赵筱卓, 张琮, 程琳, 陈辉. 旋肩胛动脉穿支皮瓣在烧伤后重度腋窝瘢痕挛缩畸形整形修复治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 294-298.
[12] 陈宏泽, 刘晟, 陈旭林. 水动力清创系统在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面清创中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 314-318.
[13] 张庆庆, 曲毅睿, 王淑君, 孙凤, 侯晓敏, 耿丽, 孙天骏. 北京市某三甲医院急诊成人烧烫伤的流行病学特征[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 324-328.
[14] 张梦思, 麻艺群, 蒙礼娟, 朱辉, 付晋凤. 压力手套与指蹼加压带及泡沫型硅凝胶贴膜联合应用于儿童瘢痕性并指术后的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 329-334.
[15] 李世杰, 申传安. 烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者呼吸机相关肺炎的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 351-355.
阅读次数
全文


摘要