切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 351 -355. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2020.05.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后微循环障碍的预测价值
张强1, 程铖1, 徐日新1,(), 吴彩凤1, 谢勇1, 刘晓东1, 梅宏斌1, 曹天庆1   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏扬州,苏北人民医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-08 出版日期:2020-10-31
  • 通信作者: 徐日新
  • 基金资助:
    扬州市科技局发展面上项目(YZ2016076)

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on microcirculatory disturbance in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Qiang Zhang1, Cheng Cheng1, Rixin Xu1,(), Caifeng Wu1, Yong Xie1, Xiaodong Liu1, Hongbin Mei1, Tianqing Cao1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
  • Received:2020-05-08 Published:2020-10-31
  • Corresponding author: Rixin Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Rixin, Email:
引用本文:

张强, 程铖, 徐日新, 吴彩凤, 谢勇, 刘晓东, 梅宏斌, 曹天庆. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后微循环障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 351-355.

Qiang Zhang, Cheng Cheng, Rixin Xu, Caifeng Wu, Yong Xie, Xiaodong Liu, Hongbin Mei, Tianqing Cao. Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on microcirculatory disturbance in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(05): 351-355.

目的

基于微循环阻力指数(IMR)探讨ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后微循环障碍的关系。

方法

选择2016年1月至2018年12月期间苏北人民医院收治的50例急性STEMI患者为研究对象,将患者分为低NLR组(NLR ≤ 6.17,25例)和高NLR组(NLR > 6.17,25例)。比较两组患者的临床资料、冠状动脉病变情况、介入治疗方案及直接PCI术后IMR值,并采用Pearson相关分析NLR与直接PCI术后IMR的相关性。

结果

低NLR组和高NLR组患者糖尿病病史(7/25 vs. 15/25,χ2 = 5.195,P = 0.023)、高血脂病史(7/25 vs. 14/25,χ2 = 4.023,P = 0.045)、中性粒细胞计数[6.33(4.04,6.66)× 109/L vs. 7.90(7.23,12.09)× 109/L,H = 18 716.000,P < 0.001]、淋巴细胞计数[1.85(1.37,2.56)× 109/L vs. 0.87(0.78,1.03)× 109/L,H = 29 710.000,P < 0.001]、发病-球囊扩张时间[227.00(180.00,390.00)min vs. 360.00(270.00,435.00),H = 25 199.500,P < 0.001]及直接PCI术后IMR值[(29.9 ± 2.7)vs.(40.4 ± 1.7),t = 16.307,P < 0.001]比较,差异均有统计学意义。Pearson相关分析显示,NLR与IMR具有正相关性(r = 0.676,P < 0.001)。进一步简单线性回归分析示,患者NLR与直接PCI术后微循环障碍的发生有关(R2 = 0.457,P < 0.001)。

结论

STEMI患者入院时,较高的NLR水平与直接PCI术后严重的微循环障碍密切相关,对预测STEMI患者直接PCI术后微循环状态有一定的参考价值。

Objective

To explore the relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and microcirculatory disturbance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR).

Methods

Fifty patients with acute STEMI from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital and divided into a low NLR group (NLR ≤ 6.17, n = 25) and a high NLR group (NLR > 6.17, n = 25). The clinical data, coronary artery disease, interventional treatment and IMR after primary PCI were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, the correlation between the NLR and IMR after primary PCI was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

The diabetes history (7/25 vs. 15/25, χ2 = 5.195, P = 0.023), hyperlipidemia history (7/25 vs. 14/25, χ2 = 4.023, P = 0.045), neutrophil count [6.33 (4.04, 6.66) × 109/L vs. 7.90 (7.23, 12.09) × 109/L, H = 18 716.000, P < 0.001], lymphocyte count [1.85 (1.37, 2.56) × 109/L vs. 0.87 (0.78, 1.03) × 109/L, H = 29 710.000, P < 0.001], onset-balloon dilation time [227.00 (180.00, 390.00) min vs. 360.00 (270.00, 435.00) min, H = 25 199.500, P < 0.001] and IMR after primary PCI [(29.9 ± 2.7) vs. (40.4 ± 1.7), t = 16.307, P < 0.001] were statistically significantly different between the low NLR group and high NLR group. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the NLR and IMR (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Further simple linear regression analysis showed that the NLR was associated with the occurrence of microcirculatory disturbance after primary PCI (R2 = 0.457, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The higher NLR of STEMI patients at admission is closely related to their severe microcirculatory disturbance after primary PCI, and it has certain reference value for predicting their microcirculation status.

表1 两组急性前壁STEMI患者临床资料比较( ± s
表2 两组急性前壁STEMI患者冠状动脉病变及介入治疗方案比较[MP25P75)]
1
Ates AH, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, et al. Total white blood cell count is associated with the presence, severity and extent of coronary atherosclerosis detected by dual-source multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography[J]. Cardiol J, 2011, 18 (4): 371-377.
2
Congiu T, Schembri L, Tozzi M, et al. Scanning electron microscopy examination of endothelium morphology in human carotid plaques[J]. Micron, 2010, 41 (5): 532-536.
3
Papa A, Emdin M, Passino C, et al. Predictive value of elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on cardiac mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2008, 395 (1-2): 27-31.
4
Núnez J, Núnez E, Bodí V, et al. Usefulness of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardio, 2008, 101 (6): 747-752.
5
Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, et al. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Am J Cardio, 2008, 102 (6): 653-657.
6
Kaya MG, Akpek M, Lam YY, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention: a prospective, multicenter study[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 168 (2): 1154-1159.
7
Machado GP, Araujo GN, Carpes CK, et al. Comparison of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume in the prediction of adverse events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2018 (274): 212-217.
8
Niccoli G, Scalone G, Lerman A, et al. Coronary microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (13): 1024.
9
Lee MJ, Park SD, Kwon SW, et al. Relation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2016, 118 (9): 1323-1328.
10
Thiele H, Desch S, de Waha S. Acute myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: ESC guidelines[J]. HERZ, 2017, 42 (8): 728-738.
11
Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, et al. Myocardial noreflow in humans[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 54 (4): 281-292.
12
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105 (21): 2482-2486.
13
李萌玫,邵一兵. 冠心病患者测定微循环阻力指数的临床意义[J]. 中国循环杂志,2016,31(10): 1022-1024.
14
Martínez GJ, Yong AS, Fearon WF, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance in the physiologic assessment of the coronary microcirculation[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2015 (26 Suppl 1): e15-e26.
15
Park SD, Baek YS, Lee MJ, et al. Comprehensive assessment of microcirculation after primary percutaneous intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2016, 27 (1): 34-39.
16
王世超,刘玉昊,武越,等. 微循环阻力指数对冠状动脉完全闭塞病变择期行介入治疗的预测价值及影响因素[J]. 中国循环杂志,2016,31(4): 332-336.
17
Ahmed N, Layland J, Carrick D, et al. Safety of guidewire-based measurement of fractional flow reserve and the index of microvascular resistance using intravenous adenosine in patients with acute or recent myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016 (202): 305-310.
18
Zernecke A, Bot I, Djalali-Talab Y, et al. Protective role of CXC receptor 4/CXC ligand 12 unveils the importance of neutrophils in atherosclerosis[J]. Circ Res, 2008, 102 (2): 209-217.
19
O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61 (4): e78-e140.
20
Heusch G, Gersh BJ. The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: a continual challenge[J]. Eur Heart J, 2017, 38 (11): 774-784.
21
Carey VJ, Bishop L, Laranjo N, et al. Contribution of high plasma triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to residual risk of coronary heart disease after establishment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2010, 106 (6): 757-763.
22
Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383 (9922): 1068-1083.
23
吴云辉,陆许贞,富凡春,等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在感染性发热患者诊治中的应用价值探讨[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2018,11(4): 270-272.
24
Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51 (5): 560-565.
25
McGeoch R, Watkins S, Berry C, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3 (7): 715-722.
26
Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve[J]. Circulation, 2006, 113 (17): 2054-2061.
27
Forget P, Khalifa C, Defour JP, et al. What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio?[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2017, 10 (1): 12.
[1] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[2] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[3] 卢凯, 王香云. 急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者血清微小RNA-200a表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 488-491.
[4] 何欣林, 阎昊铮, 赵亦非, 江彩霞, 李征宇. 新辅助化疗联合间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术对上皮性卵巢癌患者预后及血清学与影像学指标对患者预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 47-57.
[5] 成军霞, 梅馨方, 青刚, 许郭华. NLR与qSOFA评分对老年重症肺炎预后的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 703-705.
[6] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[7] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[8] 刘亮, 肖浩, 崔晓磊, 吕宝谱, 张睿, 郑拓康, 孟庆冰, 姚冬奇, 田英平, 高恒波. 急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者预后因素分析97例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-189.
[9] 林永俭, 谢雪花, 郝莉茹, 刘丽, 马英东. 优化急诊绿色通道对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者救治时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 185-189.
[10] 张杰, 纪东华. 预测和评估外周动脉疾病严重程度理化指标的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 176-179.
[11] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[12] 田欢, 吴艳凯, 宋波, 魏榕辰, 张艳, 李月戈, 武柏林. 基于心脏磁共振多模态特征评估急性心肌梗死患者预后[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 17-25.
[13] 席静妮, 李娜, 张琪. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对老年重症社区获得性肺炎进展为脓毒症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 28-31.
[14] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要