切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 377 -381. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.06.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

全心舒张末期容积指数对心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者液体复苏的应用价值
金光勇1, 林乐清2,(), 梁栋诚2, 张烛仙2, 王白永2, 王斌2, 唐文学2, 郭亮2   
  1. 1. 310015 杭州,杭州师范大学附属医院重症医学科(现工作单位为杭州市老年病医院重症医学科)
    2. 310015 杭州,杭州师范大学附属医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-12 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 林乐清
  • 基金资助:
    杭州市卫生计生科技计划(一般)项目(2016A21); 杭州市社会发展自主申报项目(20170533B44)

Clinical value of global end-diastolic volume index for fluid resuscitation in cardiac dysfunction patients with septic shock

Guangyong Jin1, Leqing Lin2,(), Dongcheng Liang2, Zhuxian Zhang2, Baiyong Wang2, Bin Wang2, Wenxue Tang2, Liang Guo2   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310015, China (now working at the Hangzhou Geriatric Hospital)
  • Received:2018-10-12 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Leqing Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Leqing, Email:
引用本文:

金光勇, 林乐清, 梁栋诚, 张烛仙, 王白永, 王斌, 唐文学, 郭亮. 全心舒张末期容积指数对心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者液体复苏的应用价值[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(06): 377-381.

Guangyong Jin, Leqing Lin, Dongcheng Liang, Zhuxian Zhang, Baiyong Wang, Bin Wang, Wenxue Tang, Liang Guo. Clinical value of global end-diastolic volume index for fluid resuscitation in cardiac dysfunction patients with septic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(06): 377-381.

目的

探讨全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDI)指导心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者液体复苏的临床价值。

方法

选择2016年1月至2018年1月收住杭州师范大学附属医院重症医学科的心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者共41例,分为中心静脉压组(CVP组)和GEDI组,其中CVP组21例,GEDI组20例。CVP组按照脓毒症指南进行常规早期目标导向治疗;GEDI组进行脉搏指示连续心输出量监测,根据GEDI指导液体复苏,使GEDI达到680 ~ 800 mL / m2,余复苏目标(平均动脉压、中心静脉血氧饱和度、尿量)同常规EGDT方案。观察两组患者达到复苏目标所需液体总量、24 h血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)、6 h及24 h脑尿钠肽、乳酸清除率、去甲肾上腺素用量。

结果

GEDI组达到复苏目标时所需液体总量少于CVP组[(2 572 ± 1 108)mL vs.(3 327 ± 925)mL,t = 2.375,P = 0.023)]。GEDI组24 h EVLWI[7.3(5.5,8.8)mL / kg vs. 9.6(8.9,9.8)mL / kg]、6 h脑尿钠肽[889.0(340.3,1 270.0)ng / L vs. 1 746.0(634.0,2 160.0)ng / L]与24 h脑尿钠肽[684.5(192.5,749.9)ng / L vs. 1 120.0(400.5,2 480.0)ng / L]均低于CVP组(Z = 86.500、120.000、124.000,P = 0.001、0.020、0.026)。GEDI组6 h乳酸清除率[34.21(15.64,45.87)% vs. 20.00(0.00,33.19)%,Z = 129.5,P = 0.037]优于CVP组,且能减少去甲肾上腺素用量[(0.9 ± 0.6)mg / kg vs. (1.9 ± 1.5)mg / kg,t’ = 2.817,P = 0.009]。

结论

心功能不全患者合并脓毒性休克时以GEDI指导的液体复苏能达到更有效的早期液体复苏目标,所需复苏液体总量及血管活性药物相对较少,肺水增加较轻且不明显加重心功能损害。

Objective

To explore the value of global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) for fluid resuscitation in cardiac dysfunction patients with septic shock.

Methods

A total of 41 cardiac dysfunction patients with septic shock hospitalized in the Department of Intensive Care Unit of Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from January 2016 to January 2018 were randomly divided into the central venous pressure (CVP) group (n = 21) and GEDI group (n = 20). Patients in the CVP group were treated with standard early goal-directed therapy recommended in sepsis guidelines. Patients in the GEDI group were monitored by pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output and performed fluid resuscitation directed by GEDI to ensure GEDI should reach 680 ~ 800 mL / m2; other goals of treatment, including mean arterial pressure, central venous oxygen saturation and urine volume, were equal to standard EGDT. The fluid volume when achieved resuscitation goals, 24 h extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), 6 h and 24 h brain natriuretic peptide, blood lactate clearance rate, and norepinephrine dosage were recorded.

Results

The liquid volume was less in the GEDI group than in CVP group [(2 572 ± 1108) mL vs. (3 327 ± 925) mL, t = 2.375, P = 0.023]. Compared to the CVP group, 24 h EVLWI [7.3 (5.5, 8.8) mL / kg vs. 9.6 (8.9, 9.8) mL / kg], 6 h brain natriuretic peptide [889.0 (340.3, 1 270.0) ng / L vs. 1 746.0 (634.0, 2 160.0) ng / L] and 24 h brain natriuretic peptide [684.5 (192.5, 749.9) ng / L vs. 1 120.0 (400.5, 2 480.0) ng / L] were lower in the GEDI group (Z = 86.500, 120.000, 124.000; P = 0.001, 0.020, 0.026). Blood lactate clearance rate in 6 h [34.21 (15.64, 45.87)% vs. 20.00 (0.00, 33.19)%] was higher, and the norepinephrine dosage [(0.9 ± 0.6) mg / kg vs. (1.9 ± 1.5) mg / kg] was less in the GEDI group than in the CVP group (Z = 129.500, t' = 2.817; P = 0.037, 0.009).

Conclusion

GEDI-directed EGDT can achieve liquid resuscitation targets more effectively in cardiac dysfunction patients with septic shock, with less fluid volume, vasoactive agent, extravascular lung water and cardiac function impairment.

表1 两组心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者一般资料比较( ± s
表2 两组心功能不全并脓毒性休克患者乳酸及乳酸清除率比较[MP25P75)]
1
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45 (3): 486-552.
2
Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. Jama, 2016, 315 (8): 762-774.
3
蔡国龙,严静,邱海波. 中国严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克治疗指南(2014):规范与实践[J]. 中华内科杂志,2015,54(6): 484-485.
4
Noel-Morgan J, Otsuki DA, Auler JO Jr, et al. Pulse pressure variation is comparable with central venous pressure to guide fluid resuscitation in experimental hemorrhagic shock with endotoxemia[J]. Shock, 2013, 40 (4): 303-311.
5
Umgelter A, Wagner K, Reindl W, et al. Haemodynamic effects of plasma-expansion with hyperoncotic albumin in cirrhotic patients with renal failure: a prospective interventional study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 27 (8): 39.
6
Lu N, Zheng R, Lin H, et al. Clinical studies of sur-viving sepsis bundles according to PiCCO on septic shock patients[J]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 2014, 26 (1): 23-27.
7
Liu X, Wenli JI, Wang J, et al. Application strategy of PiCCO in septic shock patients[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 11 (4): 1335-1339.
8
Lu NF, Zheng RQ, Lin H, et al. Improved sepsis bu-ndles in the treatment of septic shock: a prospective clinical study[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2015, 33 (8): 1045-1049.
9
高秋芳,高洪媛,屈峰. 床旁B超在脓毒性休克合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2018,11(5): 338-341.
10
Hofmann D, Klein M, Wegscheider K, et al. Extended hemodynamic monitoring using transpulmonary thermodilution influence of various factors on the accuracy of the estimation of intrathoracic blood volume and extravascular lung water in critically ill patients[J]. Der Anaesthesist, 2005, 54 (4): 319-326.
11
Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, et al. Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis[J]. Shock, 2009, 32 (1): 35-39.
12
Gu WJ, Zhang Z, Bakker J. Early lactate clearance-guided therapy in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41 (10): 1862-1863.
13
Simpson SQ, Gaines M, Hussein Y, et al. Early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock: a living systematic review[J]. J Crit Care, 2016 (36): 43-48.
[1] 龚利缘, 应利君, 吕铁, 李川吉. 平均动脉压对不同乳酸清除率脓毒性休克患者预后的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 37-42.
[2] 林乐清, 曹伟, 唐泽文, 王白永, 王磊, 张宁, 唐文学. 脓毒性休克患者液体复苏时外周灌注指数的临床指导价值研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 460-465.
[3] 王婵, 李博玲, 史晓娟, 荆程桥, 董道然, 宗媛. 脓毒症心肌病发病率及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(03): 177-182.
[4] 李娜, 王美霞, 周晋萌, 刘虹, 赵兰, 姚哲放, 王雪慧. 维生素D对脓毒性休克导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的干预价值研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 321-327.
[5] 谢友军, 莫武桂, 韦跃, 韦蓉, 卢功志. 限制性液体复苏策略对儿童脓毒性休克失代偿期患儿的临床疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 687-694.
[6] 谢友军, 莫武桂, 韦跃, 韦蓉, 唐育鹏. 早期目标导向治疗后检测乳酸清除率对连续性血液净化治疗脓毒性休克患儿时机选择的指导作用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 543-550.
[7] 杨敏, 乔莉娜, 李德渊, 刘忠强, 罗黎力. 儿童重症监护病房收治的脓毒症患儿血清乳酸脱氢酶水平对病情及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(02): 209-217.
[8] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[9] 郭光华, 付忠华. 重新评价人血白蛋白在危重烧伤患者液体复苏中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 461-465.
[10] 邓兴旺, 齐旭辉, 杨绍贤, 张龙, 金少华, 杨涛, 蒲文兰, 李传吉. 人血白蛋白在重症烧伤休克早期液体复苏中应用的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(01): 47-53.
[11] 刘英, 李群, 常文静, 郑云辉, 臧学峰. 老年重症感染性休克患者病原菌分布特点及心功能、炎性因子指标变化的临床分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(01): 59-63.
[12] 崔广清, 葛玲玉. PiCCO指导心功能不全合并脓毒症休克患者精准救治的效果[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 185-190.
[13] 高志伟, 谢剑锋, 刘玲, 陈辉, 李聪, 杨毅. 舒张压对脓毒性休克进展预测价值及治疗指导的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 159-163.
[14] 张倩, 胡振杰, 刘丽霞. 主动脉流速时间积分变异度对重症脓毒症患者液体复苏的指导[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2020, 06(01): 77-85.
[15] 姜帅宇, 路晓光, 吴萌萌. 限制性液体复苏对脓毒症休克患者疗效的meta分析[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 18-25.
阅读次数
全文


摘要