切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 13 -17. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2017.01.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

骑跨型与主干型肺栓塞患者临床特征的比较研究
邵利江1, 马国峰2, 宗建平1, 陈先汉1, 陈志华1, 应可净2,()   
  1. 1. 315000 浙江宁波,宁波市第一医院急诊科
    2. 310016 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-19 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 应可净
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81270107); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2015KYB216); 宁波市社发项目(2013C50041)

Clinical analysis of patients with saddle pulmonary embolism and its comparison with the main pulmonary artery embolization

Lijiang Shao1, Guofeng Ma2, Jianping Zong1, Xianhan Chen1, Zhihua Chen1, Kejing Ying2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
    2. Department of Respiratory Disease & Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China
  • Received:2016-12-19 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Kejing Ying
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ying Kejing, Email:
引用本文:

邵利江, 马国峰, 宗建平, 陈先汉, 陈志华, 应可净. 骑跨型与主干型肺栓塞患者临床特征的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(01): 13-17.

Lijiang Shao, Guofeng Ma, Jianping Zong, Xianhan Chen, Zhihua Chen, Kejing Ying. Clinical analysis of patients with saddle pulmonary embolism and its comparison with the main pulmonary artery embolization[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(01): 13-17.

目的

分析骑跨型肺栓塞的临床特征并与左右肺动脉干栓塞进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2011年8月至2015年2月浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院及宁波市第一医院17例骑跨型肺栓塞患者的临床资料。将17例骑跨型肺栓塞症患者纳入骑跨组,同期选择96例左右肺动脉主干肺栓塞患者为非骑跨组。对两组患者的高血压史、3个月内手术或创伤史、脉搏、收缩压、舒张压、休克或低血压发生比例、D-二聚体、肌钙蛋白Ⅰ、血氧分压、氧合指数、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、右心功能不全发生比例及右室收缩压水平进行比较。同时进行出院随访,记录两组患者3个月全因病死率。

结果

骑跨组与非骑跨组患者主要临床症状均为呼吸困难(12/17 vs. 74/96)、咳嗽(6/17 vs. 20/96)、胸痛(5/17 vs. 15/96)及晕厥(5/17 vs. 17/96),但两组比较差异均没有统计学意义(χ2 = 0.335、1.705、1.885、1.262,P = 0.563、0.192、0.170、0.261)。两组间各指标比较,仅骑跨组患者3个月内手术或创伤史(6/17 vs. 9/96,χ2 = 8.428,P = 0.004)及血氧分压水平[(89 ± 25)mmHg vs.(79 ±25)mmHg,t = 2.002,P = 0.045]显著高于非骑跨组。全部患者均住院治疗,无住院死亡病例。骑跨组3个月全因死亡例数为0,而非骑跨组为2例。

结论

骑跨型肺栓塞患者短期预后不劣于肺动脉主干肺栓塞患者,对此类患者可根据肺栓塞危险分层而非是否骑跨给予相应治疗。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with saddle pulmonary embolism (SPE) and its comparison with left and right main pulmonary artery embolization.

Methods

The clinical data of 17 patients with saddle pulmonary thromboembolism from August 2011 to February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. And 96 patients with pulmonary embolism in right and/or left pulmonary artery were enrolled as the non-SPE group. The hypertension, surgery or trauma within 3 months, pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, shock or hypotension, D-dimer, serum cardiac troponin Ⅰ, partial pressure of blood oxygen, oxygenation index, N-terminal pro-brain nitric peptide, right ventricular dysfunction and right ventricular systolic blood pressure were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, the death cases in 3 months were recorded during the follow-up.

Results

The main clinical symptom in the SPE group and non-SPE group were dyspnea (12/17 vs. 74/96), cough (6/17 vs. 20/96), chest pain (5/17 vs. 15/96) and syncope (5/17 vs. 17/96), and there were no siginificant differences among the above symptoms (χ2 = 0.335, 1.705, 1.885, 1.262; P = 0.563, 0.192, 0.170, 0.261). And in the SPE group, the surgery or trauma within 3 months (6/17 vs. 9/96, χ2 = 8.428, P = 0.004) and partial pressure of blood oxygen [(89 ± 25) mmHg vs. (79 ± 25) mmHg, t = 2.002, P = 0.045] were much higher than those in the non-SPE group. All patients were hospitalized and no patient died during the hospitalization. Two cases in the non-SPE group died of pulmonary embolism, but no case died in the SPE group within 3 months.

Conclusion

The short-term prognosis of patients with saddle pulmonary thromboembolism is not inferior to that of patients with pulmonary trunk embolism, and the patients can be treated according to the risk stratification of pulmonary embolism rather than whether having saddle or not.

表1 骑跨组与非骑跨组肺栓塞患者一般临床资料的比较( ± s
表2 骑跨组与非骑跨组肺栓塞患者实验室检查指标的比较( ± s
1
McDonald IG, Hirsh J, Hale GS, et al. Saddle pulmonary embolism: a surgical emergency?[J]. Lancet, 1970, 1 (7641): 269-271.
2
Sardi A, Gluskin J, Guttentag A, et al. Saddle pulmonary embolism: is it as bad as it looks? A community hospital experience[J]. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39 (11):2413-2418.
3
Choi KJ, Cha SI, Shin KM, et al. Central emboli rather than saddle emboli predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Thromb Res, 2014, 134 (5): 991-996.
4
中华医学会心血管病学分会肺血管病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会.急性肺血栓栓塞症诊断治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志,2010,49(1):74-81.
5
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35 (43): 3033-3069, 3069a-3069k.
6
Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2010, 170 (15): 1383-1389.
7
Kwak MK, Kim WY, Lee CW, et al. The impact of saddle embolism on the major adverse event rate of patients with non-high-risk pulmonary embolism[J]. Br J Radiol, 2013, 86 (1032):20130273.
8
Pruszczyk P, Pacho R, Ciurzynski M, et al. Short term clinical outcome of acute saddle pulmonary embolism[J]. Heart, 2003, 89 (3): 335-336.
9
Ryu JH, Pellikka PA, Froehling DA, et al. Saddle pulmonary embolism diagnosed by CT angiography: frequency, clinical features and outcome[J]. Respir Med, 2007, 101 (7): 1537-1542.
10
杨鹤,方保民,陈起航,等. 骑跨型肺动脉栓塞15例临床分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2013,36(5):357-359.
11
Enzweiler CN, Wiese TH, Lembcke AE, et al. Electron beam tomography of interpulmonary saddle embolism: extent and vascular distribution[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2002, 26 (1): 26-32.
12
Pathak R, Giri S, Karmacharya P, et al. Comparison between saddle versus non-saddle pulmonary embolism: insights from nationwide inpatient sample[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2015 (180): 58-59.
13
国家"十五"攻关"肺检塞规范化诊治方法的研究"课题组. 急性肺血栓栓塞症患者516例临床表现分析[J]. 中华医学杂志,2006,86(31):2161-2165.
14
Gandara E, Bose G, Erkens P, et al. Outcomes of saddle pulmonary embolism: a nested case-control study[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2011, 9 (4): 867-869.
15
丁洁,郭晓纲. 肺栓塞危险因素与预后评价的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2016,9(1):58-66.
16
Laporte S, Mismetti P, Décousus H, et al. Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117 (13): 1711-1716.
17
Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)[J]. Lancet, 1999, 353 (9162): 1386-1389.
18
宫小薇,袁雅冬. 肺血栓栓塞症全因死亡相关因素的荟萃分析[J]. 中华医学杂志,2013,93(32):2534-2540.
19
龚道银,王耀宾,张岑岑,等. 肺动脉血栓栓塞猝死23例法医病理学分析[J]. 法医学杂志,2010,26(1):33-36.
20
Wood KE. Major pulmonary embolism: review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism[J]. Chest, 2002, 121 (3): 877-905.
21
中华医学会心血管病学分会肺血管病学组.急性肺栓塞诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2015)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(3):197-211.
22
Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines[J]. Chest, 2012, 141 (2 Suppl): e419S-e494S.
[1] 赵飞鸿, 陈颖杰, 林静芳, 郑晓春, 廖燕凌. 超声引导下周围神经阻滞对髋膝关节置换术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 457-468.
[2] 吴姗姗, 潘裕民, 刘晋, 张劲松, 乔莉. 睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生率的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 312-317.
[3] 马中正, 杨云川, 马翔, 周迟, 丁丁, 霍俊一, 徐楠, 崔培元, 周磊. 胰腺癌双硫死亡相关的lncRNA预后模型的构建及免疫反应研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 368-376.
[4] 张春玉, 陈海云, 肖忠萍, 罗琴, 潘运昌. 血清NT-proBNP 预测肺栓塞心脏功能障碍的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 805-808.
[5] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[6] 陈伟杰, 何小东. 胆囊癌免疫靶向治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 763-768.
[7] 林科灿, 罗柳平. 肝胰十二指肠切除术在胆囊癌和胆管癌应用中的关键问题[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 774-778.
[8] 张英信, 林婷, 张剑文. 构建靶向HLA-A2且表达PD-L1的CAR-Treg细胞及验证其对CD4+T细胞抑制作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 719-728.
[9] 李佳莹, 王旭丹, 梁雪, 张雷, 李佳英. 1990~2021年中国结直肠癌死亡趋势分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 274-279.
[10] 张少青, 吕玉风, 董海霞. 中性粒细胞百分比/白蛋白比值对维持性血液透析患者全因死亡的预测作用[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 321-326.
[11] 王小龙, 吴杰, 冯哲, 文浩, 段姝伟, 梁爽, 蔡广研. 心内科病房急性肾损伤且行肾脏替代治疗患者短期预后不良的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 241-248.
[12] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[13] 于洁, 金小红, 顾艳楣, 王慧, 葛杨杨, 李燕. 癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症患者疾病体验与需求的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 739-744.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 丁洪基, 赵长江, 孙鹏飞, 王灿, 王贵珍, 李龙龙. 细胞焦亡与疾病的关系研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 682-686.
阅读次数
全文


摘要