Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04): 282-289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2025.04.003

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Application of healthcare failure mode and effect analysis in safety management of clinical trial drug infusion

Yaping Deng1, Yinying Qiu1, Qiuyue Shao2, Zhimin Yu2, Qin Li3, Xinyan Yu4,5,()   

  1. 1Department of Breast Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
    2Department of Thoracic Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
    3Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
    4Nursing Department, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
    5School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China
  • Received:2025-04-09 Online:2025-08-31 Published:2025-10-23
  • Contact: Xinyan Yu

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of healthcare failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) in the safety management of clinical trial drug infusion.

Methods

Under the guidance of HFMEA theory, a risk assessment was conducted on the clinical trial drug infusion management process. Potential failure modes were analyzed, and the causes and effects of failure were explored. Based on risk factors, improvement measures were developed and implemented, and then the improvement effectiveness was evaluated, including the risk priority number (RPN), standardization rates of drug infusion, infusion bottle stickers, medical consumables, data collection and document recording, and satisfaction of nurses and doctors.

Results

Through decision tree analysis, 28 potential failure causes were identified as key improvement targets. After implementing the HFMEA model, the total RPN score decreased from 247 to 93, with a decrease of 62.3%. Meanwhile, there were no adverse nursing events related to clinical trials. The standardization rates of drug infusion [95.0% (95 / 100) vs. 86.0% (86 / 100), χ2 = 4.711, P = 0.030], infusion bottle stickers [100.0% (100 / 100) vs. 75.0% (75 / 100), χ2 = 28.571, P < 0.001], medical consumables [96.0% (288 / 300) vs. 77.7% (233 / 300), χ2 = 44.097, P < 0.001], data collection [93.0% (93 / 100) vs. 82.0% (82 / 100), χ2 = 5.531, P = 0.019], and document recording [90.0% (90 / 100) vs. 76.0% (76 / 100), χ2 = 6.945, P = 0.008] after implementation all significantly improved compared with those before implementation. Besides, the satisfaction scores of nurses and doctors increased from (4.2 ± 2.0) and (6.5 ± 2.4) before implementation to (8.2 ± 1.5) and (8.9 ± 1.2) after implementation respectively (t = 4.309, P = 0.040; t = 55.910, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The prospective application of HFMEA can effectively improve the safety management level of clinical trial drug infusion by shifting passive post treatment to proactive prevention.

Key words: Healthcare failure mode and effect analysis, Clinical trial, Drug infusion, Safety management

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0571-87236467 E-mail: zhwzzyxzz@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd