切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 9 -13. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2022.01.003

论著

成人体外心肺复苏患者神经功能预后相关指标的预测价值研究
王淦楠1, 张忠满1, 许晓泉2, 孙娜娜2, 陈旭锋1, 张劲松1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院急诊科
    2. 210029 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-29 出版日期:2022-02-28
  • 通信作者: 张劲松
  • 基金资助:
    睿E(睿意)急诊医学研究专项基金资助项目(R2019019); 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(SJCX20_0481)

Study on the predictive value of neurological prognosis-related indicators in survivors of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Gannan Wang1, Zhongman Zhang1, Xiaoquan Xu2, Nana Sun2, Xufeng Chen1, Jinsong Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Emergency department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    2. Radiology department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2021-08-29 Published:2022-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Jinsong Zhang
引用本文:

王淦楠, 张忠满, 许晓泉, 孙娜娜, 陈旭锋, 张劲松. 成人体外心肺复苏患者神经功能预后相关指标的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 9-13.

Gannan Wang, Zhongman Zhang, Xiaoquan Xu, Nana Sun, Xufeng Chen, Jinsong Zhang. Study on the predictive value of neurological prognosis-related indicators in survivors of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2022, 15(01): 9-13.

目的

探讨成人体外心肺复苏(ECPR)患者神经功能预后相关指标的判断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年4月于南京医科大学第一附属医院急诊科接受ECPR治疗的69例心脏骤停患者。根据患者出院时脑功能表现分级(CPC)评分将69例患者分为预后良好组(26例,CPC评分1 ~ 2分)和预后不良组(43例,CPC评分3 ~ 5分)。所有患者均于体外生命支持建立后24 h内接受头颅CT检查,测定其灰质/白质比例(GWR)。记录所有患者的一般资料及72 h内血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)峰值水平。采用Spearman相关分析探讨基底节GWR与NSE水平的相关性,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价相关指标对ECPR患者神经功能预后的判断价值。

结果

预后不良组心脏骤停患者基底节GWR [1.15(1.10,1.22)vs. 1.26 (1.22,1.28),Z = 4.576,P < 0.001]较预后良好组显著降低,而体外膜肺氧合建立后72 h内血清NSE峰值[205.80(105.00,370.00)μg/L vs. 41.25(31.96,52.07)μg/L,Z = 5.910,P < 0.001]显著升高。Spearman相关分析结果显示,基底节GWR与NSE水平呈显著负相关(r = -0.685,P < 0.001)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,基底节GWR [曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.831,95%置信区间(CI)(0.735,0.926),P < 0.001]及NSE 72 h内峰值[AUC = 0.926,95%CI(0.859,0.992),P < 0.001]均对心脏骤停患者神经功能不良预后具有预测价值。基底节GWR < 1.18时,其预测神经功能不良预后的敏感度和特异度分别为62.8%和92.3%。ECMO建立后72 h内NSE峰值> 79.49 μg/L时,其预测不良预后的敏感度为83.7%,特异度为100%。

结论

ECPR患者24 h内头颅CT提示GWR降低、72 h内NSE水平升高可作为预测神经功能预后不良的有效手段。

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic value of neurological outcome predictors in survivors of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Methods

A total of 69 cardiac arrest patients who were treated with ECPR in Emergency Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2018 to April 2021 were enrolled in this single-center retrospective study. In accordance with the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale at discharge, the patients were divided into a good outcome group (CPC 1-2, n = 26) and a poor outcome group (CPC 3-5, n = 43). All patients underwent CT scans within 24 h after establishment of extracorporeal life support and the gray-white matter ratio (GWR) was calculated according to previous studies. The peak levels of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) within 72 h as well as clinical information were recorded. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between basal ganglia GWR and NSE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was drawn to determine the prognostic value of neurological outcome predictors in patients who were treated with ECPR.

Results

The basal ganglia GWR [1.15 (1.10, 1.22) vs. 1.26 (1.22, 1.28), Z = 4.576, P < 0.001] was significantly lower in the poor outcome group than in the good one, while the peak level of NSE within 72 h after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation establishment [205.80 (105.00, 370.00) μg/L vs. 41.25 (31.96, 52.07) μg/L, Z = 5.910, P < 0.001] was significantly higher in the poor outcome group. The results of Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that basal ganglia GWR was negatively correlated with the NSE level (r = -0.685, P < 0.001). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that basal ganglia GWR [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.831, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.735, 0.926), P < 0.001] and the peak level of NSE within 72 h [AUC = 0.926, 95%CI(0.859, 0.992), P < 0.001] both had predictive value for poor neurological prognosis in CA patients. The basal ganglia GWR < 1.18 predicted a poor outcome with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.8% and 92.3%, respectively. The peak level of NSE within 72 h > 79.49 μg/L predicted a poor outcome with 83.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Conclusion

The decreased GWR from brain CT within 24 h after establishment of extracorporeal life support and the elevated level of NSE can be promising tools to assess a poor neurological outcome in survivors of adult ECPR.

表1 两组心脏骤停患者一般资料比较[MP25P75)]
表2 两组心脏骤停患者神经功能预后指标比较[MP25P75)]
1
Kalra R, Kosmopoulos M, Goslar T, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2020, 26 (3): 228-235.
2
Patricio D, Peluso L, Brasseur A, et al. Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective propensity score matched study[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23 (1): 27.
3
Callaway CW. Neuroprognostication postcardiac arrest: translating probabilities to individuals[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2018, 24 (3): 158-164.
4
Keijzer HM, Hoedemaekers CWE, Meijer FJA, et al. Brain imaging in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: pathophysiological correlates and prognostic properties[J]. Resuscitation, 2018 (133): 124-136.
5
Wang GN, Chen XF, Lv JR, et al. The prognostic value of gray-white matter ratio on brain computed tomography in adult comatose cardiac arrest survivors[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2018, 81 (7): 599-604.
6
王淦楠,陈科,陈旭锋,等.头颅CT视神经鞘直径测定对成人心搏骤停后昏迷患者预后的判断价值[J].临床急诊杂志201920(1):25-29.
7
Greer DM, Wu O. Neuroimaging in cardiac arrest prognostication[J]. Semin Neurol, 2017, 37 (1): 66-74.
8
王淦楠,陈旭锋,梅勇,等.头颅CT灰质/白质比例对成人心搏骤停后昏迷患者预后的判断价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志201726(6):659-663.
9
邱方方,陆远强.生命的桥梁——体外膜肺氧合在心脏骤停中的应用[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)201912(4):217-222.
10
Brooks SC, Anderson ML, Bruder E, et al. Part 6: alternative techniques and ancillary devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132 (18 suppl 2): S436-S443.
11
Abrams DC, Prager K, Blinderman CD, et al. Ethical dilemmas encountered with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults[J]. Chest, 2014, 145 (4): 876-882.
12
Taccone FS, Baar I, De Deyne C, et al. Neuroprognostication after adult cardiac arrest treated with targeted temperature management: task force for Belgian recommendations[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017, 117 (1): 3-15.
13
Sandroni C, Cariou A, Cavallaro F, et al. Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40 (12): 1816-1831.
14
Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabanas JG, et al. Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation, 2020, 142 (16 suppl 2): S366-S468.
15
Friberg H, Cronberg T, Dünser MW, et al. Survey on current practices for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2015 (90): 158-162.
16
Hawkes MA, Rabinstein AA. Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest in the era of target temperature management[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2019, 19 (2): 10.
17
Kim SH, Choi SP, Park KN, et al. Early brain computed tomography findings are associated with outcome in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2013, (21): 57.
18
Hong JY, Lee DH, Oh JH, et al. Grey-white matter ratio measured using early unenhanced brain computed tomography shows no correlation with neurological outcomes in patients undergoing targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2019 (140): 161-169.
19
Streitberger KJ, Endisch C, Ploner CJ, et al. Timing of brain computed tomography and accuracy of outcome prediction after cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2019 (145): 8-14.
20
Streitberger KJ, Leithner C, Wattenberg M, et al. Neuron-specific enolase predicts poor outcome after cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management: a multicenter study on 1,053 patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45 (7): 1145-1151.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要