切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 264 -269. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2020.04.005

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

论著

IG4电磁导航系统辅助CT引导下肺穿刺活检术在肺占位病变诊断中的临床价值
曾晖1, 章浙伟1, 严兴2, 邵国良1,()   
  1. 1. 310022 杭州,浙江省肿瘤医院介入科
    2. 310022 杭州,浙江省肿瘤医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-25 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 邵国良
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2019KY043)

Clinical value of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy assisted by IG4 electromagnetic navigation system in diagnosing pulmonary lesions

Hui Zeng1, Zhewei Zhang1, Xing Yan2, Guoliang Shao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Intervention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, China
  • Received:2020-02-25 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Guoliang Shao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shao Guoliang, Email:
引用本文:

曾晖, 章浙伟, 严兴, 邵国良. IG4电磁导航系统辅助CT引导下肺穿刺活检术在肺占位病变诊断中的临床价值[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 264-269.

Hui Zeng, Zhewei Zhang, Xing Yan, Guoliang Shao. Clinical value of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy assisted by IG4 electromagnetic navigation system in diagnosing pulmonary lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(04): 264-269.

目的

评估IG4电磁导航系统辅助CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检术在肺占位病变中的应用价值。

方法

将125例拟行肺穿刺活检术的肺占位患者分为对照组(62例)及磁导组(63例)。对照组患者采用普通CT引导下肺穿刺活检术,磁导组采用IG4电磁导航系统辅助CT引导下肺穿刺活检术。记录所有患者的临床基础资料包括白细胞计数,血小板计数(PLT),国际标准化比值(INR),活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT),凝血酶原时间(PT),丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT),血肌酐,肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB),C反应蛋白质(CRP)以及肺癌相关标志物神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、血清鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA),并对两组患者间肺穿刺活检术中定位时间、穿刺针调整次数、扫描次数、接受辐射剂量[剂量长度乘积(DLP)]、病理诊断敏感度以及气胸、出血等并发症发生率进行比较。

结果

两组患者穿刺前白细胞计数、PLT、INR、APTT、PT、ALT、血肌酐、CK-MB、CRP、NSE、SCCA的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。同时,磁导组患者在穿刺术中定位时间[(9.5 ± 2.6)min vs.(13.6 ± 4.1)min,t = 6.584,P < 0.001]、调针次数[(3.0 ± 1.3)次vs.(3.8 ± 1.8)次,t = 2.662,P = 0.009]、扫描次数[(3.9 ± 1.2)次vs.(5.8 ± 1.8)次,t = 6.853,P < 0.001]、DLP[(291 ± 167)mGy × cm vs.(407 ± 307)mGy × cm,t = 2.622,P = 0.010]方面均明显优于对照组;且磁导组患者气胸发生率[15.87%(10/63)vs. 33.87%(21/62),χ2 = 5.204,P = 0.023]及出血发生率[20.63%(13/63)vs. 38.71%(24/62),χ2 = 4.899,P = 0.027]均明显低于对照组患者。而两组患者病理诊断的敏感度比较,差异无统计学意义[89.66%(52/58)vs. 96.36%(53/55),χ2 = 1.931,P = 0.165]。

结论

IG4电磁导航系统辅助CT引导下肺穿刺活检术在安全性及对患者的伤害程度等方面明显优于常规CT引导下的肺穿刺活检术,具有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the application value of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy assisted by the IG4 electromagnetic navigation system in diagnosing pulmonary lesions.

Methods

A total of 125 patients with pulmonary lesions to undergo CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy were randomly divided into a control group (62 patients) and a magnetic group (63 patients). Patients in the control group were performed conventional CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy, and patients in the magnetic group received CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy assisted by the IG4 electromagnetic navigation system. The white blood cell count, platelet count (PLT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum creatinine, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lung cancer related markers of neuronspecific enolase (NSE) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) before the piercing were recorded. The positioning time, needle adjustment times, scanning times, radiation dose [dose length product (DLP)], pathological diagnosis sensitivity and incidence of complications such as pneumothorax and bleeding were compared between the two groups.

Results

The levels of white blood cell count, PLT, INR, APTT, PT, ALT, serum creatinine, CK-MB, CRP, NSE and SCCA before puncture all showed no significant differences between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Meanwhile, the positioning time [(9.5 ± 2.6) min vs. (13.6 ± 4.1) min, t = 6.584, P < 0.001], needle adjustment times [(3.0 ± 1.3) times vs. (3.8 ± 1.8) times, t = 2.662, P = 0.009], scanning times [(3.9 ± 1.2) times vs. (5.8 ± 1.8) times, t = 6.853, P < 0.001] and DLP [(291 ± 167) mGy × cm vs. (407 ± 307) mGy × cm, t = 2.622, P = 0.010] in the magnetic group were significantly better than those in the control group. The incidence of pneumothorax [15.87% (10/63) vs. 33.87% (21/62), χ2 = 5.204, P = 0.023] and bleeding [20.63% (13/63) vs. 38.71% (24/62), χ2 = 4.899, P = 0.027] in the magnetic group was significantly lower than that in the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the pathological diagnosis sensitivity between the two groups [89.66% (52/58) vs. 96.36% (53/55), χ2 = 1.931, P = 0.165].

Conclusion

The CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy assisted by the IG4 electromagnetic navigation system is significantly superior to conventional CT-guided lung biopsy in terms of safety and degree of injury to patients, and has high clinical application value.

表1 两组肺占位患者一般资料的比较(例)
表2 两组肺占位患者肺穿刺前实验室指标的比较[MP25P75)]
表3 两组肺占位患者肺穿刺术相关指数的比较( ± s
1
张霖,雒志明,张威,等.多层CT导向下经皮肺穿刺活检术的临床应用[J].中国医刊,2016,51(12):18-21.
2
Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for pneumothorax and chest tube placement after CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of the procedures conducted over a 9-year period [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194 (3): 809-814.
3
王忠敏,陈志瑾,李麟荪.CT四维电磁导航在肿瘤微创介入治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2014,23(2):93-95.
4
Spira A, Halmos B, Powell CA. Update in lung cancer 2014[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 192 (3): 283-294.
5
Smith MA, Battafarano RJ, Meyers BF, et al. Prevalence of benign disease in patients undergoing resection for suspected lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 81 (5): 1824-1829.
6
Flores R, Bauer T, Aye R, et al. Balancing curability and unnecessary surgery in the context of computed tomography screening for lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147 (5): 1619-1626.
7
Grogan EL, Weinstein JJ, Deppen SA, et al. Thoracic operations for pulmonary nodules are frequently not futile in patients with benign disease[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2011, 6 (10): 1720-1725.
8
Mazzone P, Powell CA, Arenberg D, et al. Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement [J]. Chest, 2015, 147 (2): 295-303.
9
Fritz J, Thomas C, Tzaribachev N, et al. MRI-guided injection procedures of the temporomandibular joints in children and adults: technique, accuracy, and safety[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193 (4): 1148-1154.
10
赵霞,丁玉江,夏光进,等.纤支镜下刷检联合液基超薄细胞技术在周围型肺癌中的诊断价值[J].临床肺科杂志,2010,15(2):268.
11
曾萍虹. CT引导下肺穿刺活检术在孤立性肺结节中的诊断价值分析[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(6):878-880.
12
Barta JA, Henschke CI, Flores RM, et al. Lung cancer diagnosis by fine needle aspiration is associated with reduction in resection of nonmalignant lung nodules[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 103 (6): 1795-1801.
13
Deppen SA, Davis WT, Green EA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of initial diagnostic strategies for pulmonary nodules presenting to thoracic surgeons[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 98 (4): 1214-1222.
14
Gilbert S, Zhang H, Villeneuve PJ, et al. Optimizing health care resource utilization in the surgical management of patients with suspected lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 94 (5): 1667-1672.
15
Appelbaum L, Sosna J, Nissenbaum Y, et al. Electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided biopsy of small lesions[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 196 (5): 1194-1200.
16
Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Horii SC. Multimodality image display: desirable frame buffer characteristics[J]. J Med Syst, 1988, 12 (4): 189-200.
17
Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005, 16 (4): 493-505.
18
张凯,梁萍.影像引导下介入操作中导航技术的应用综述[J].解放军医学院学报,2017,38(4):376-378.
19
杨杰,肖越勇,张肖,等.电磁导航系统在CT引导下经皮穿刺肺活检术中的应用[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2012,9(3):172-174.
20
Braak SJ, Herder GJ, Van Heesewijk JP, et al. Pulmonary masses: initial results of cone-beam CT guidance with needle planning software for percutaneous lung biopsy[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012, 35(6): 1414-1421.
21
Santos RS, Gupta A, Ebright MI, et al. Electromagnetic navigation to aid radiofrequency ablation and biopsy of lung tumors[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 89 (1): 265-268.
22
Yildirim E, Kirbas I, Harman A, et al. CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy using modified coaxial technique: factors effecting risk of complications[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 70 (1): 57-60.
23
Li Y, Du Y, Yang HF, et al. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for small (≤ 20 mm) pulmonary lesions[J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68 (1): e43-e48.
24
Capasso R, Nizzoli R, Tiseo M, et al. Extra-pleuric coaxial system for CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of small (≤ 20 mm) lung nodules: a novel technique using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images[J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34 (2): 17.
25
Kuban JD, Tam AL, Huang SY, et al. The effect of needle gauge on the risk of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after percutaneous computed tomographic (CT)-guided lung biopsy[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2015, 38 (6): 1595-15602.
26
李平,曹军丽,张庆怀,等.孤立肺微结节86例CT引导下经皮穿刺取材活检术[J].介入放射学杂志,2013,22(12):1049-1051.
27
曾萍虹. CT引导下肺穿刺活检术在孤立性肺结节中的诊断价值分析[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(6):878-880.
28
Yaffe D, Koslow M, Haskiya H, et al. A novel technique for CT-guided transthoracic biopsy of lung lesions: improved biopsy accuracy and safety[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25 (11): 3354-3360.
[1] 寇鹏, 李志萍, 李迎梅, 孟箭. 下颌下腺多形性腺瘤复发伴双侧多发肺转移一例[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 300-304.
[2] 王晓燕, 肖佑, 肖戈, 王真权. 老年结直肠癌肺转移CT特征及高危因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-509.
[3] 望云, 张正委, 范丽, 樊荣荣, 涂文婷, 刘士远. 原发性结节肿块型肺黏液腺癌的CT表现与病理基础[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 151-156.
[4] 沈会华, 邢国柱, 李悟. 肺剂量和炎性细胞因子在预测放疗诱导性肺毒性中的临床价值[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 764-768.
[5] 卢晓倩, 孟繁杨, 窦乐, 曹殿波. 肺腺癌MSCT影像特征与EGFR突变相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(03): 319-323.
[6] 杨敬平, 杨俊俊, 周婵, 刘娜, 徐兴祥. 肺泡灌洗液在肺癌早期诊断方面的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 97-99.
[7] 金俊余, 周军, 刘佳琳, 卓文磊. 多种固定方式4D-CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检在肺癌诊断中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(05): 621-624.
[8] 陈雪芬, 邓静敏. 国内外179例原发性肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌的文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 551-556.
[9] 毛海霞, 徐蒙莱, 冯银波, 陈宏伟, 方向明. CT图像纹理分析对小于10 mm纯磨玻璃结节侵袭性的诊断价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 367-370.
[10] 丁荣, 牛有权, 黄明, 赵玲, 杨银山, 吴起杰, 谭骅, 周劲梅. 肺部恶性肿瘤热消融系列并发症防治的文献复习[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 434-439.
[11] 谭锦莉, 林勇平, 徐韫健. 探讨叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞在肺癌患者早期诊断与预后评估中的作用[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 101-106.
[12] 赵传, 姜鲁宁, 李岷, 李钊, 徐芳, 高雅文, 李鑫. 晚期非小细胞肺癌诊断及呼吸康复治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 211-216.
[13] 巫超, 陈家骏, 纪建松. 肺上皮样血管内皮瘤1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 117-121.
[14] 陶善明, 徐美青, 解明然. 胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗早期肺癌研究进展[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2020, 07(04): 247-251.
[15] 于德志, 王凌鹤, 高蔷, 王志远, 杨振坤, 马俊杰, 马小贝. 肺肝样腺癌临床病理学特点和诊治分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2020, 07(02): 90-93.
阅读次数
全文


摘要