切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 182 -187. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2017.03.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

胸部恶性肿瘤根治术后患者目标导向液体治疗的价值研究
黄剑1,(), 柳开忠1, 刘文生1   
  1. 1. 310022 杭州,浙江省肿瘤医院ICU
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-25 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 黄剑

Evaluation of goal-directed fluid therapy after radical surgery in patients with thoracic malignant neoplasms

Jian Huang1,(), Kaizhong Liu1, Wensheng Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Received:2016-11-25 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jian Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Jian, Email: Huanjue@163.com
引用本文:

黄剑, 柳开忠, 刘文生. 胸部恶性肿瘤根治术后患者目标导向液体治疗的价值研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(03): 182-187.

Jian Huang, Kaizhong Liu, Wensheng Liu. Evaluation of goal-directed fluid therapy after radical surgery in patients with thoracic malignant neoplasms[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(03): 182-187.

目的

探讨目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)在胸部恶性肿瘤根治术后患者的应用价值。

方法

收集100例择期全身麻醉下行胸部恶性肿瘤根治术的患者分为对照组和GDFT组,每组各50例。对照组患者术后常规补液治疗,GDFT组患者进行个体化目标导向滴定式补液治疗。比较两组患者入ICU时(T1)、术后8 h(T2)及24 h(T3)的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、心脏指数及每搏输出量(SV)。同时,记录所有患者术后低血容量、肺水肿、代谢性酸中毒的发生情况、ICU住院时间及总住院时间。

结果

两组患者心率指标各时间点比较,差异无统计学意义(F = 0.335,P = 0.564),而MAP、CVP、心脏指数及SV水平各时间点间的比较,差异均有统计学意义(F = 7.905,P = 0.006;F = 76.563,P < 0.001;F = 378.906,P < 0.001;F = 267.969,P < 0.001),且在T2、T3时GDFT组MAP[(80 ± 9)mmHg vs.(68 ± 10)mmHg,(85 ± 11)mmHg vs.(76 ± 9)mmHg]、CVP[(7.9 ± 2.8)cmH2O vs.(4.6 ± 2.2)cmH2O,(8.3 ± 3.0)cmH2O vs.(5.7 ± 2.9)cmH2O]、心脏指数[(2.9 ± 0.4)L·min-1·m-2 vs.(2.2 ± 0.3)L·min-1·m-2,(3.1 ± 0.3)L·min-1·m-2 vs.(2.4 ± 0.3)L·min-1·m-2]及SV[(53 ± 11)mL vs.(49 ± 9)mL,(61 ± 10)mL vs.(48 ± 10)mL]水平均显著高于对照组(P均< 0.05)。同时,与对照组相比,GDFT组患者术后低血容量发生率[17/50 vs. 8/50,χ2 = 5.869,P = 0.015]较低,ICU住院时间[(4.9 ± 2.7)vs.(2.9 ± 1.8)d,t = 4.137,P < 0.001]及总住院时间[(22 ± 4)d vs.(17 ± 5)d,t = 4.660,P < 0.001]明显缩短。

结论

胸部恶性肿瘤根治术后患者行GDFT方法的血流动力学参数显著优于常规补液的方法,同时可减少患者ICU住院时间,有助于患者的术后恢复。

Objective

To investigate the value of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) after radical surgery in patients with thoracic malignant neoplasms.

Methods

Totally 100 patients with malignant neoplasms underwent thoracic surgery were randomly divided to the control group and GDFT group, 50 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine fluid therapies, and patients in the GDFT group were given individually GDFT. The heart rates, mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index and stroke volume (SV) were detected at ICU (T1), 8 h (T2), 24 h (T3) after surgery. The incidence rates of hypovolemia, pulmonary edema and metabolic acidosis after surgery, length of ICU and hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The heart rates in the two groups showed no significant differences (F = 0.335, P = 0.564), and the MAP, CVP, cardiac index and SV all showed significant differences between the two groups (F = 7.905, P = 0.006; F = 76.563, P < 0.001; F = 378.906, P < 0.001; F = 267.969, P < 0.001), and MAP [(80 ± 9) mmHg vs. (68 ± 10) mmHg, (85 ± 11) mmHg vs. (76 ± 9) mmHg], CVP [(7.9 ± 2.8) cmH2O vs. (4.6 ± 2.2) cmH2O, (8.3 ± 3.0) cmH2O vs. (5.7 ± 2.9) cmH2O], cardiac index [(2.9 ± 0.4) L·min-1·m-2 vs. (2.2 ± 0.3) L·min-1·m-2, (3.1 ± 0.3) L·min-1·m-2 vs. (2.4 ± 0.3) L·min-1·m-2] and SV [(53 ± 11) mL vs. (49 ± 9) mL, (61 ± 10) mL vs. (48 ± 10) mL] in the GDFT group at T2, T3 were much higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence rates of hypovolemia were much lower [17/50 vs. 8/50, χ2 = 5.869, P = 0.015], the length of ICU [(4.9 ± 2.7) d vs. (2.9 ± 1.8) d, t = 4.137, P < 0.001] and hospital stay [(22 ± 4) d vs. (17 ± 5) d, t = 4.660, P < 0.001] were much shorter in the GDFT group.

Conclusion

GDFT could significantly improve hemodynamic parameters and reduce the length of hospital stay, and be helpful to postoperative recovery of patients with thoracic malignant neoplasms.

表1 两组胸部恶性肿瘤患者术前一般资料的比较( ± s
表2 两组胸部恶性肿瘤患者手术前后各时间点血流动力学参数的比较( ± s
表3 两组胸部恶性肿瘤患者术后并发症发生率及住院时间的比较( ± s
1
翁毅敏,蔡松旺,廖洪映,等. 胸腔镜辅助与常规开胸肺叶切除治疗肺癌的疗效对比[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版),2009,30(s1):165-166.
2
解雅英,于建设,吴莉. 目标导向液体治疗临床新进展[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(7):1828-1829.
3
Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Gerlach H, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2013, 27 (3): 225-233.
4
Aya HD, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, et al. Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2013, 110 (4): 510-517.
5
Rhodes A, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, et al. Goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a 15-year follow-up study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36 (8): 1327-1332.
6
Cecconi M, Corredor C, Arulkumaran N, et al. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17 (2): 209.
7
Luo J, Xue J, Liu J, et al. Goal-directed fluid restriction during brain surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2017, 7 (1): 16.
8
Yuan J, Sun Y, Pan C, et al. Goal-directed fluid the-rapy for reducing risk of surgical site infections following abdominal surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2017 (39): 74-87.
9
Rollins KE, Lobo DN. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263 (3): 465-476.
10
Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al. Pros-pective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients[J]. Chest, 1988, 94 (6): 1176-1186.
11
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345 (19): 1368-1377.
12
刘晓文. 老年腹部外科手术的危险因素与防治对策[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2005,11(4):7-9.
13
向东明,夏志洁,肖东,等. 老年患者腹部手术后再次转入外科ICU的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(5):1487-1489.
14
Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. 'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' perioperative fluid therapy-a critical assessment of the evidence [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2009, 53 (7): 843-851.
15
Lobo SM, Salgado PF, Castillo VG, et al. Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (10): 3396-3404.
16
Bellomo R, Raman J, Ronco C. Intensive care unit management of the critically ill patient with fluid overload after open heart surgery[J]. Cardiology, 2001, 96 (3-4): 169-176.
17
赵国良,周银燕,彭沛华,等. 目标导向液体治疗对胃肠道肿瘤手术老年患者术后康复的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志,2015,35(4):453-456.
18
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pre-ssure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41 (7): 1774-1781.
19
Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter[J]. N Engl J Med, 1970, 283 (9): 447-451.
20
Connors AF Jr, McCaffree DR, Gray BA. Evaluation of right-heart catheterization in the critically ill patient without acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 1983, 308 (5): 263-267.
21
Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision[J]. Anesthesiology, 2010, 113 (5): 1220-1235.
22
姚萍,吴允孚,曾元英,等. 彩色多普勒超声心动图、Swan-Ganz导管和脉波指示剂连续心排血量监测仪血流动力学检测的同步比较研究[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2010,3(2):99-103.
23
Rudziński PN, Henzel J, Dzielińska Z, et al. Pul-monary artery rupture as a complication of Swan-Ganz catheter application. Diagnosis and endovascular treatment: a single centre's experience[J]. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej, 2016, 12 (2): 135-139.
24
费云捷,张洪熹,张大维,等. Swan-Ganz流向导管的并发症分析[J]. 上海医学,1993,16(5):281-282.
25
Mcgee WT, Horswell JL, Calderon J, et al. Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial[J]. Crit Care, 2007, 11 (5): R105.
26
Wang P, Wang HW, Zhong TD. Effect of stroke vol-ume variability-guided intraoperative fluid restriction on gastrointestinal functional recovery[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59 (120): 2457-2460.
27
Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study[J]. Crit Care, 2010, 14 (3): R118.
28
Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management[J]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 111 (4): 910-914.
29
Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88 (1): 65-71.
30
Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 2002, 97 (4): 820-826.
31
Portari PEP, Diogo IP, Ravanini G, et al. Protocol of restricted perioperative fluid therapy reduces surgical morbidity after major abdominal surgery[J]. AClin Nutr ESPEN, 2016 (12): e53.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[3] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[7] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[10] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[11] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[12] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[13] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要