切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 334 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.05.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者急性胃肠损伤发生率及其预后研究
张定峰1, 左祥荣2,(), 曹权2   
  1. 1. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科;243000 安徽马鞍山,马鞍山十七冶医院重症医学科
    2. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-24 出版日期:2016-10-01
  • 通信作者: 左祥荣
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(JX10231801); 江苏省"六大人才高峰"第九批高层次人才项目(2012-WS-028)

The incidence rate of acute gastrointestinal injury and its prognostic value in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Dingfeng Zhang1, Xiangrong Zuo2,(), Quan Cao2   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Maanshan Shiqiye Hospital, Maanshan 243000, China
    2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2016-05-24 Published:2016-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangrong Zuo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zuo Xiangrong, E-mail:
引用本文:

张定峰, 左祥荣, 曹权. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者急性胃肠损伤发生率及其预后研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 334-338.

Dingfeng Zhang, Xiangrong Zuo, Quan Cao. The incidence rate of acute gastrointestinal injury and its prognostic value in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(05): 334-338.

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者急性胃肠损伤(AGI)的发生率及其对预后的评价。

方法

分析2009年1月至2015年12月在马鞍山十七冶医院重症医学科收治的146例AECOPD患者的临床资料,进行AGI诊断和分级,依据28 d内存活情况,将发生AGI的患者分为存活组(72例)和死亡组(17例),比较两组患者年龄、性别、合并症以及急性病生理学和长期健康评价(APACHEⅡ)评分、临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)。依据APACHEⅡ评分分值将AECOPD患者分成四组,轻度组(39例)、重度组(53例)、危重度组(35例)和极危重度组(19例);另依据CPIS评分分值分成三组,轻度组(71例)、中度组(53例)和重度组(22例),比较各分组间AGI发生率和28 dAGI病死率。同时对不同AGI分级患者的28 d病死率也进行比较。

结果

146例AECOPD患者中有89例发生AGI,发生率为60.96%,其中Ⅰ级53例(59.55%)、Ⅱ级19例(21.35%)、Ⅲ级11例(12.36%)、Ⅳ级6例(6.74%)。AECOPD合并AGI患者存活组和死亡组的年龄、性别、合并症等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05);但存活组患者APACHEⅡ评分[(20 ± 5)分vs.(28 ± 5)分,t = 5.833,P< 0.001]、CPIS评分[(3.5 ± 1.5)分vs.(5.4 ± 1.6)分,t = 4.568,P< 0.001]均显著低于死亡组。APACHEⅡ评分分组中AGI发生率和28 dAGI病死率各组比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 27.369、47.838,P均< 0.001);而CPIS评分分组中AGI发生率和28 dAGI病死率各组比较,差异也均有统计学意义(χ2 = 24.025、47.453,P均< 0.001)。不同AGI分级患者28 d病死率比较(1.89%、15.79%、63.64%和100.00%),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 49.829,P < 0.05)。

结论

AECOPD患者AGI发生率高,且AGI分级越高,预后越差,应当重视AECOPD患者AGI的诊治。

Objective

To investigate the incidence rate of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) and its effect on prognosis in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

The diagnosis, grades of AGI and other clinical data of 146 cases of AECOPD patients admitted from January 2009 to December 2015 in Maanshan Shiqiye Hospital were studied retrospectively. AECOPD patients with AGI were divided into the survival group (n = 72) and death group (n = 17) according to the survival condition within the 28-day period. The age, gender, complications and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱscore, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and AGI grades were compared between the two groups. Based on APACHEⅡscores, AECOPD patients were divided into four groups: mild group (n = 39), severe group (n = 53), critically severe group (n = 35), and extremely severe group (n = 19). The incidence rate and 28-d mortality of AGI were evaluated among these four groups. According to CPIS, the patients were divided into three groups: mild group (n = 71), moderate group (n = 53), and severe group (n = 22); comparing the incidence rate and 28-d mortality of AGI in these three groups. Meanwhile, the 28-d mortality in different grades of AGI patients were analyzed.

Results

Among 146 AECOPD patients, 89 patients (60.96%) had AGI, and there were 53 (59.55%), 19 (21.35%), 11 (12.36%) and 6 (6.74%) cases in AGI grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ, respectively. There were statistically significant differences of prognosis among different AGI grades (P < 0.05). There was no difference in age, gender and complications between the survival group and death group (all P > 0.05). However, the APACHEⅡscore [(20 ± 5) vs. (28 ± 5), t = 5.833, P< 0.001] and CPIS [(3.5 ± 1.5) vs. (5.4 ± 1.6), t = 4.568, P< 0.001] of the survival group were significantly lower than those of the death group. The incidence rate and 28-d mortality of AGI were significantly different in four APACHEⅡscore groups (χ2 = 27.369, 47.838; all P< 0.001), and also different in three CPIS groups (χ2 = 24.025, 47.453; all P< 0.001). In addition, the differences of 28-d mortality in four grades of AGI patients were statistically significant (1.89%, 15.79%, 63.64%, 100.00%; χ2 = 49.829, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The incidence rate of AGI in AECOPD patients is quite high. The higher the AGI grade, the worse the prognosis. Thus, we should pay attention to the diagnosis and treatment of AGI in AECOPD patients.

表1 两组AECOPD合并AGI患者一般资料的比较(± s
表2 不同AGI分级的AECOPD患者的机械通气时间和住ICU时间的比较(±s
1
慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治专家组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治中国专家共识(2014年修订版)[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2014, 34(1):1-11.
2
Lee H,Kim S,Lim Y, et al. Nutritional status and disease severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2013, 56(3): 518-523.
3
缪红英,赵蓓. 莫沙必利口服联合厚朴粉穴位贴敷治疗AECOPD胃肠功能障碍的临床研究[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2013, 37(10):1259-1260, 1264.
4
朱承睿,栾正刚,尹晓晗, 等. 急性胃肠损伤分级对疾病严重程度及预后评估价值研究(附296例报告)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(5):531-533.
5
Reintam Blaser A,Malbrain ML,Starkopf J, et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on abdominal problems[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2012, 38(3): 384-394.
6
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2013, 36(4):235-240.
7
韦广莹,卢荣恒,李晶. 血清超敏C反应蛋白、血清样淀粉酶A与降钙素原对脓毒症患者的预测价值[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2015, 8(4):170-174.
8
孙文丽. 老年吸入性肺炎患者动态监测血清超敏C反应蛋白的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2010, 3(3):170-174.
9
汪华学,赵士兵,吴强, 等. 3321例ICU重症患者急性胃肠功能障碍的发生及其预后[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2014, 19(2):126-128.
10
顾艳利,代冰,康健. 罗氟司特治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效及其安全性的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2016, 9(3):174-183.
11
晁成磊,桑胜利. 早期应用含膳食纤维的肠内营养对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期营养状况及预后的影响[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2015, 17(3):65-66.
12
黄瑞峰,郭军,吕波, 等. 通腑理肺法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者胃肠功能调节的疗效观察[J]. 贵阳中医学院学报, 2013, 35(5):299-301.
13
付跃峰,刘清泉,蔡阳平, 等. AECOPD呼吸衰竭中医证素、证候的分布及与胃肠功能障碍相关研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2014, 9(3):265-269, 274.
14
段歆,成小梅. 急性生理与慢性健康评分在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者预后评价中的应用价值[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2015(1):122-123.
15
连增志,穆传勇,黄建安, 等. APACHEⅡ评分与临床肺部感染评分在AECOPD患者中应用比较分析[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2009, 14(11):1463-1465.
16
胡炜科,邵利江,虞松平, 等. 肺部感染评分和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分对COPD急性加重期并2型呼吸衰竭患者预后评估的应用价值[J]. 中国现代医生, 2015, 53(11):8-10, 15.
17
董科奇,邓杰. 急性胃肠损伤分级对严重脓毒症预后评估的价值[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2015, 13(1):15-18.
[1] 周杉京, 诸葛金科, 王芳芳. 补肺活血胶囊对COPD患者cCor、ALD、Ang-Ⅱ的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 517-519.
[2] 吴庆华, 冒勇, 闫效坤. AECOPD并发AKI的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 529-531.
[3] 芦丹, 杨硕, 刘旭. VEGF、HMGB1、hs-CRP/Alb在AECOPD伴呼吸衰竭中的变化及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 532-534.
[4] 熊锋, 娄建丽. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期预后的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 550-553.
[5] 王庆, 张红联, 吴志勇. COPD合并多重耐药菌肺部感染预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 557-559.
[6] 林静, 陈芳, 刘小霞. COPD患者认知功能障碍影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 569-571.
[7] 张七妹, 麦宜准, 蒋浩波. 喘可治对慢性阻塞性肺疾病缓解期的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 578-580.
[8] 张林, 刘芳, 赵静, 刘勇, 周青. 远程康复在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复中的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 601-604.
[9] 唐英俊, 李华娟, 王赛妮, 徐旺, 刘峰, 李羲, 郝新宝, 黄华萍. 人脐带间充质干细胞治疗COPD小鼠及机制分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 476-480.
[10] 徐丽玲, 卢玉宝, 赵彦, 任利, 李姝艺, 符娟, 康玲, 汪青松, 尤再春. COPD管理云平台的构建及临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 481-484.
[11] 李海明, 刘鸿飞, 李俊. 血清脂蛋白酶水平与COPD患者骨骼肌质量减少的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 500-503.
[12] 苏国栋, 王剑桥, 刘洋, 樊祥德, 樊华, 刘惠林. 吸气肌训练对COPD运动恐动症的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 421-423.
[13] 赵晓红, 修翠萍, 张瑜, 吴珂. 大康复理念在COPD稳定期肺康复治疗的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 424-426.
[14] 罗静, 王霞, 高上兰, 张彬霞, 廖菲. 5A+5R式管理干预在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 429-431.
[15] 廖玥, 王可, 秦江月, 吴艳秋, 陈俊, 汪涛, 文富强, 王浩. 丹龙口服液治疗轻中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的多中心及前瞻性研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 306-311.
阅读次数
全文


摘要