硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.02.002

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -86. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.02.002

所属专题：文献；

论著

硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究

赵雯洁¹, 王琛², 孙波¹, 单海华¹, 王安¹, 乔世刚²^,^†(

)

^1. 215004　江苏苏州，苏州大学附属第二医院麻醉科
^2. 215163　江苏苏州，苏州科技城医院的麻醉科

收稿日期:2015-10-11 出版日期:2016-04-01
通信作者: 乔世刚
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金面上研究项目(BK20141187); 苏州市科技计划项目(SYS201473); 苏州大学附属第二医院博士、留学归国人员预研项目(SDFEYBS1401)

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury

Wenjie Zhao¹, Chen Wang², Bo Sun¹, Haihua Shan¹, An Wang¹, Shigang Qiao²^,^†()

^1. Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China
^2. Department of Anesthesiology, Suzhou Science and Technology City Hospital, Suzhou 215000, China

Received:2015-10-11 Published:2016-04-01
Corresponding author: Shigang Qiao
About author:
Corresponding author: Qiao Shigang, Email: qiaoshigang@163.com

全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用

引用本文：

赵雯洁, 王琛, 孙波, 单海华, 王安, 乔世刚. 硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(02): 81-86.

Wenjie Zhao, Chen Wang, Bo Sun, Haihua Shan, An Wang, Shigang Qiao. Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(02): 81-86.

目的

观察硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤（I/R）的保护作用及其与自噬潮的关系。

方法

将60只成年雄性SD大鼠分为五组：假手术组：仅开胸并分离冠状动脉左前降支，但不结扎阻断血流；I/R组：于冠状动脉左前降支阻断30 min，再灌注4 h；氯喹（CQ）组：于术前1 h腹腔注射10 mg/kg，其余操作同I/R组；硫氢化钠（NaHS）组：于开放左冠状动脉再灌注即刻1 min内静脉注射硫氢化钠0.05 mg/kg，再灌注4 h；CQ + NaHS组：于术前1 h腹腔注射CQ，其余操作同NaHS组；每组12只。连续监测并记录大鼠平衡期15 min、缺血期15 min、再灌注1、2、4 h时大鼠心率、平均动脉压和心率-收缩压乘积（RPP）。再灌注4 h结束后分批处死大鼠并取心脏测定心肌梗死范围，并采用Western blotting法测定微管相关蛋白1轻链3（LC3）、Cathepsin B、Beclin-1、P62表达水平。

结果

各组大鼠在各时间点心率的比较，差异无统计学意义（F=0.854，P=0.512），而平均动脉压及RPP的比较差异均有统计学意义（F=5.182，P=0.007；F=5.082，P=0.008）。且再灌注期2、4 h时，NaHS组平均动脉压为（87 ± 8）mmHg、（91 ± 10）mmHg，RPP为（35.4 ± 4.6）次·mmHg·10³/min、（36.2 ± 5.8）次·mmHg·10³/min，NaHS组明显高于I/R组[平均动脉压分别为（72 ± 10）mmHg、（63 ± 6）mmHg，RPP分别为（28.7±5.8）次·mmHg·10³/min、（26.8 ± 3.8）次·mmHg·10³/min，P均< 0.05]。各组灌注期4 h时，心肌梗死范围区域所占比例及LC3、Cathepsin B、Beclin-1、P62比较差异均有统计学意义（F=96.907、71.164、43.594、57.180、35.967，P均< 0.05），且NaHS组上述各指标均明显低于I/R组、CQ组、CQ + NaHS组（P均< 0.05）。

结论

硫化氢可能通过修复自噬潮对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌I/R损伤发挥保护作用。

关键词: 硫化氢, 缺血后处理, 心肌再灌注损伤, 糖尿病，2型, 自噬, 大鼠

Objective

To investigate the correlative of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting against myocardial ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury in type 2 diabetic rats in vivo.

Methods

Sixty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups (n=12): sham group, I/R group, chloroquine (CQ) group, sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) group and CQ + NaHS group. Rats in the sham group only gave thoracotomy and separation of the left anterior descending coronary artery; In the I/R group rats were occluded the left anterior descending coronary artery for 30 min, followed by 4 h of reperfusion; In the CQ group rats received CQ 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection at 1 h before the I/R operation; In the NaHS group rats were injected NaHS 0.05 mg/kg intravenously within 1 min after releasing the left anterior descending coronary artery undergoing 30 min occlusion, then followed by 4 h of reperfusion; and in the CQ + NaHS group rats received CQ 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection at 1 h before the I/R operation additionally on the basis of NaHS group. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure and rate-pressure product (RPP) were detected and recorded at 15 min of balance period, ischemic period, and 1, 2, 4 h after reperfusion. After reperfusion for 4 h, the rats were sacrificed and the hearts were used to calculate the range of myocardial infarction and the express of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), Cathepsin B, Beclin-1 and P62 were determined by Western blotting.

Results

The heart rates in the five groups had no siginficant differences at each time point (F=0.854, P=0.512), but the mean arterial pressure and RPP showed siginficant differences among the five groups at each time point (F=5.182, P=0.007; F=5.082, P=0.008). Furthermore, the mean arterial pressure[(87 ± 8) mmHg vs. (72 ± 10) mmHg, (91±10) mmHg vs. (63 ± 6) mmHg] and RPP [(35.4 ± 4.6)·10³ mmHg·beat/min vs. (28.7 ± 5.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min, (36.2 ± 5.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min vs. (26.8 ± 3.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min] in the NaHS group at 2, 4 h after reperfusion were much higher than those in the I/R group (all P<0.05). The range of myocardial infarction and the express of LC3, Cathepsin B, Beclin-1 and P62 at 4 h after reperfusion all had statistical significance obviously among five groups (F=96.907, 71.164, 43.594, 57.180, 35.967, all P<0.05) , and above indicators in the NaHS group were much lower than those in the I/R group, CQ group and CQ + NaHS group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Hydrogen sulfide postconditioning play a protective role through repairinng autophagy flux in type 2 diabetic rats with I/R injury.

Key words: Hydrogen sulfide, Ischemic postconditioning, Myocardial reperfusion injury, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Autophagy, Rats

表1 各组大鼠血流动力学变化的比较（±s）

组别		例数	平衡期	缺血期	再灌注期1 h	再灌注期2 h	再灌注期4 h
心率（min^-1）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	392 ± 32	382 ± 49	393 ± 51	382 ± 37	381 ± 38
?	I/R组	8	388 ± 45	385 ± 39	379 ± 51	381 ± 41	375 ± 37
?	CQ组	8	382 ± 51	375 ± 47	382 ± 44	379 ± 58	388 ± 35
?	NaHS组	8	388 ± 47	385 ± 41	379 ± 53	381 ± 43	375 ± 39
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	380 ± 32	386 ± 57	382 ± 52	385 ± 28	377 ± 46
平均动脉压（mmHg）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	118 ± 15	115 ± 16	110 ± 10	113 ± 12	110 ± 17
?	I/R组	8	122 ± 17	102 ± 11^a	88 ± 12^a	72 ± 10^a	63 ± 6^a
?	CQ组	8	123 ± 16	108 ± 13^a	90 ± 9^a	75 ± 14^ab	65 ± 9^ab
?	NaHS组	8	125 ± 18	101 ± 9^a	99 ± 10^a	87 ± 8^ac	91 ± 10^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	124 ± 12	103 ± 12^a	92 ± 11^a	76 ± 10^ab	66 ± 12^ab
RPP（次·mmHg·10³/min）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	48.8 ± 5.8	47.8 ± 7.2	45.0 ± 7.1	45.5 ± 8.0	44.6 ± 8.3
?	I/R组	8	51.2 ± 8.2	42.3 ± 6.5^a	38.8 ± 6.3^a	28.7 ± 5.8^a	26.8 ± 3.8^a
?	CQ组	8	51.3 ± 7.8	41.9 ± 6.8^a	38.6 ± 7.1^a	28.8 ± 6.2^ab	27.4 ± 6.3^ab
?	NaHS组	8	48.8 ± 8.5	42.9 ± 7.1^a	39.9 ± 7.5^a	35.4 ± 4.6^ac	36.2 ± 5.8^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	49.5 ± 8.0	42.8 ± 8.6^a	39.4 ± 4.5^a	30.2 ± 4.6^ab	26.5 ± 4.8^ab

表1 各组大鼠血流动力学变化的比较（±s）

组别		例数	平衡期	缺血期	再灌注期1 h	再灌注期2 h	再灌注期4 h
心率（min^-1）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	392 ± 32	382 ± 49	393 ± 51	382 ± 37	381 ± 38
?	I/R组	8	388 ± 45	385 ± 39	379 ± 51	381 ± 41	375 ± 37
?	CQ组	8	382 ± 51	375 ± 47	382 ± 44	379 ± 58	388 ± 35
?	NaHS组	8	388 ± 47	385 ± 41	379 ± 53	381 ± 43	375 ± 39
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	380 ± 32	386 ± 57	382 ± 52	385 ± 28	377 ± 46
平均动脉压（mmHg）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	118 ± 15	115 ± 16	110 ± 10	113 ± 12	110 ± 17
?	I/R组	8	122 ± 17	102 ± 11^a	88 ± 12^a	72 ± 10^a	63 ± 6^a
?	CQ组	8	123 ± 16	108 ± 13^a	90 ± 9^a	75 ± 14^ab	65 ± 9^ab
?	NaHS组	8	125 ± 18	101 ± 9^a	99 ± 10^a	87 ± 8^ac	91 ± 10^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	124 ± 12	103 ± 12^a	92 ± 11^a	76 ± 10^ab	66 ± 12^ab
RPP（次·mmHg·10³/min）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	48.8 ± 5.8	47.8 ± 7.2	45.0 ± 7.1	45.5 ± 8.0	44.6 ± 8.3
?	I/R组	8	51.2 ± 8.2	42.3 ± 6.5^a	38.8 ± 6.3^a	28.7 ± 5.8^a	26.8 ± 3.8^a
?	CQ组	8	51.3 ± 7.8	41.9 ± 6.8^a	38.6 ± 7.1^a	28.8 ± 6.2^ab	27.4 ± 6.3^ab
?	NaHS组	8	48.8 ± 8.5	42.9 ± 7.1^a	39.9 ± 7.5^a	35.4 ± 4.6^ac	36.2 ± 5.8^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	49.5 ± 8.0	42.8 ± 8.6^a	39.4 ± 4.5^a	30.2 ± 4.6^ab	26.5 ± 4.8^ab

图1 2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血区范围及梗死范围比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n= 8

图2 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白LC3表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图3 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白Cathepsin B表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图4 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白Beclin-1表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图5 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白P62表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

[1]	马伟斌，江荣林，雷澍，等.半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶12在糖尿病心肌病大鼠心肌中的表达及葛根素的干预研究[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志：电子版，2012，5（1）：6-12.
[2]	Paul BD, Snyder SH. H₂S: a novel gasotransmitter that signals by sulfhydration[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 2015, 40 (11): 687-700.
[3]	Xie H, Xu Q, Jia J, et al. Hydrogen sulfide protects against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury by activating AMP-activated protein kinase to restore autophagic flux[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 458 (3): 632-638.
[4]	Rubinsztein DC, Cuervo AM, Ravikumar B, et al. In search of an "autophagomometer"[J]. Autophagy, 2009, 5 (5): 585-589.
[5]	Qiao S, Xie H, Wang C, et al. Delayed anesthetic pre-conditioning protects against myocardial infarction via activation of nuclear factor-κB and upregulation of autophagy[J]. J Anesth, 2013, 27 (2): 251-260.
[6]	Tang C, Li X, Du J. Hydrogen sulfide as a new endogenous gaseous transmitter in the cardiovascular system[J]. Curr Vasc Pharmacol, 2006, 4 (1): 17-22.
[7]	Kimura H. Hydrogen sulfide induces cyclic AMP and modulates the NMDA receptor[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2000, 267 (1): 129-133.
[8]	Liu YH, Lu M, Hu LF, et al. Hydrogen sulfide in the mammalian cardiovascular system[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2012, 17 (1): 141-185.
[9]	DiChiara J, Bliden KP, Tantry US, et al. The effect of aspirin dosing on platelet function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: an analysis from the aspirin-induced platelet effect (ASPECT) study[J]. Diabetes, 2007, 56 (12): 3014-3019.
[10]	McArdle MA, Finucane OM, Connaughton RM, et al. Mechanisms of obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance: insights into the emerging role of nutritional strategies[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2013, 4: 52.
[11]	吴玉玲，马继春，王兴程，等.外源性硫化氢对合并高血糖的大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤后的作用[J].临床心血管病杂志，2015，31（4）：451-454.
[12]	Whiteman M, Gooding KM, Whatmore JL, et al. Adiposity is a major determinant of plasma levels of the novel vasodilator hydrogen sulphide[J]. Diabetologia, 2010, 53 (8): 1722-1726.
[13]	Yan H, Du J, Tang C. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide on the pathogenesis of spontaneous hypertension in rats [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2004, 313 (1): 22-27.
[14]	Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2010, 22 (2): 124-131.
[15]	Appelqvist H, Waster P, Kagedal K, et al. The lysosome: from waste bag to potential therapeutic target[J]. J Mol Cell Bio, 2013, 5 (4): 214-226.
[16]	Ma X, Liu H, Foyil SR, et al. Impaired autophagosome clearance contributes to cardiomyocyte death in ischemia/reperfusion injury[J]. Circulation, 2012, 125 (25): 3170-3181.
[17]	Dong Y, Undyala VV, Gottlieb RA, et al. Autophagy: definition, molecular machinery, and potential role in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, 2010, 15 (3): 220-230.
[18]	Gustafsson AB, Gottlieb RA. Autophagy in ischemic heart disease[J]. Circ Res, 2009, 104 (2): 150-158.
[19]	Dorn GW 2nd. Mechanisms of non-apoptotic programmed cell death in diabetes and heart failure[J]. Cell Cycle, 2010, 9 (17): 3442-3448.
[20]	Solomon VR, Lee H. Chloroquine and its analogs: a new promise of an old drug for effective and safe cancer therapies[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2009, 625 (1-3): 220-233.

[1]	李康, 冀亮, 赵维, 林乐岷. 自噬在乳腺癌生物学进展中的双重作用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 195-202.
[2]	孔莹莹, 谢璐涛, 卢晓驰, 徐杰丰, 周光居, 张茂. 丁酸钠对猪心脏骤停复苏后心脑损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 355-362.
[3]	张巧梅, 孙小平, 李冠胜, 邓扬嘉. 针灸对大鼠呼吸机相关性肺炎中性粒细胞归巢及胞外诱捕网的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 265-271.
[4]	张晓燕, 肖东琼, 高沪, 陈琳, 唐发娟, 李熙鸿. 转录因子12过表达对脓毒症相关性脑病大鼠大脑皮质的保护作用及其机制[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 540-549.
[5]	靳茜雅, 黄晓松, 谭诚, 蒋琴, 侯昉, 李瑶悦, 徐冰, 贾红慧, 刘文英. 产前他克莫司治疗对先天性膈疝大鼠病理模型肺血管重构的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 428-436.
[6]	周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[7]	魏强, 张明祥, 陈强谱, 孙宝房. 增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠胃肠道动力的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 267-270.
[8]	聂锋, 李婉珍. 不打针不吃药不输液徒手治疗糖尿病一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-354.
[9]	杨蕴钊, 周诚, 石美涵, 赵静, 白雪源. 人羊水间充质干细胞对膜性肾病大鼠的治疗作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 181-186.
[10]	任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[11]	萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[12]	王小红, 钱晶, 翁文俊, 周国雄, 朱顺星, 祁小鸣, 刘春, 王萍, 沈伟, 程睿智, 秦璟灏. 巯基丙酮酸硫基转移酶调控核因子κB信号介导自噬对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠的影响及机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 422-426.
[13]	张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[14]	郭如烨, 孟黎明, 陈楠, 宋玉莹, 尹海燕, 郭岩. Apelin/APJ系统对帕金森病模型的神经保护作用及机制研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 276-282.
[15]	邱甜, 杨苗娟, 胡波, 郭毅, 何奕涛. 亚低温治疗脑梗死机制的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury