硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.02.002

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -86. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.02.002

所属专题：文献；

论著

硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究

赵雯洁¹, 王琛², 孙波¹, 单海华¹, 王安¹, 乔世刚^,²

^1. 215004　江苏苏州，苏州大学附属第二医院麻醉科
^2. 215163　江苏苏州，苏州科技城医院的麻醉科

收稿日期:2015-10-11 出版日期:2016-04-01
通信作者: 乔世刚
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金面上研究项目(BK20141187); 苏州市科技计划项目(SYS201473); 苏州大学附属第二医院博士、留学归国人员预研项目(SDFEYBS1401)

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury

Wenjie Zhao¹, Chen Wang², Bo Sun¹, Haihua Shan¹, An Wang¹, Shigang Qiao^,²

^1. Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China
^2. Department of Anesthesiology, Suzhou Science and Technology City Hospital, Suzhou 215000, China

Received:2015-10-11 Published:2016-04-01
Corresponding author: Shigang Qiao
About author:
Corresponding author: Qiao Shigang, Email: qiaoshigang@163.com

全文 ( 0 ) 下载PDF ( 1 ) 导出引用

引用本文：

赵雯洁, 王琛, 孙波, 单海华, 王安, 乔世刚. 硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其与自噬潮的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(02): 81-86.

Wenjie Zhao, Chen Wang, Bo Sun, Haihua Shan, An Wang, Shigang Qiao. Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(02): 81-86.

目的

观察硫化氢后处理对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤（I/R）的保护作用及其与自噬潮的关系。

方法

将60只成年雄性SD大鼠分为五组：假手术组：仅开胸并分离冠状动脉左前降支，但不结扎阻断血流；I/R组：于冠状动脉左前降支阻断30 min，再灌注4 h；氯喹（CQ）组：于术前1 h腹腔注射10 mg/kg，其余操作同I/R组；硫氢化钠（NaHS）组：于开放左冠状动脉再灌注即刻1 min内静脉注射硫氢化钠0.05 mg/kg，再灌注4 h；CQ + NaHS组：于术前1 h腹腔注射CQ，其余操作同NaHS组；每组12只。连续监测并记录大鼠平衡期15 min、缺血期15 min、再灌注1、2、4 h时大鼠心率、平均动脉压和心率-收缩压乘积（RPP）。再灌注4 h结束后分批处死大鼠并取心脏测定心肌梗死范围，并采用Western blotting法测定微管相关蛋白1轻链3（LC3）、Cathepsin B、Beclin-1、P62表达水平。

结果

各组大鼠在各时间点心率的比较，差异无统计学意义（F=0.854，P=0.512），而平均动脉压及RPP的比较差异均有统计学意义（F=5.182，P=0.007；F=5.082，P=0.008）。且再灌注期2、4 h时，NaHS组平均动脉压为（87 ± 8）mmHg、（91 ± 10）mmHg，RPP为（35.4 ± 4.6）次·mmHg·10³/min、（36.2 ± 5.8）次·mmHg·10³/min，NaHS组明显高于I/R组[平均动脉压分别为（72 ± 10）mmHg、（63 ± 6）mmHg，RPP分别为（28.7±5.8）次·mmHg·10³/min、（26.8 ± 3.8）次·mmHg·10³/min，P均< 0.05]。各组灌注期4 h时，心肌梗死范围区域所占比例及LC3、Cathepsin B、Beclin-1、P62比较差异均有统计学意义（F=96.907、71.164、43.594、57.180、35.967，P均< 0.05），且NaHS组上述各指标均明显低于I/R组、CQ组、CQ + NaHS组（P均< 0.05）。

结论

硫化氢可能通过修复自噬潮对2型糖尿病大鼠心肌I/R损伤发挥保护作用。

关键词: 硫化氢, 缺血后处理, 心肌再灌注损伤, 糖尿病，2型, 自噬, 大鼠

Objective

To investigate the correlative of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting against myocardial ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury in type 2 diabetic rats in vivo.

Methods

Sixty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups (n=12): sham group, I/R group, chloroquine (CQ) group, sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) group and CQ + NaHS group. Rats in the sham group only gave thoracotomy and separation of the left anterior descending coronary artery; In the I/R group rats were occluded the left anterior descending coronary artery for 30 min, followed by 4 h of reperfusion; In the CQ group rats received CQ 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection at 1 h before the I/R operation; In the NaHS group rats were injected NaHS 0.05 mg/kg intravenously within 1 min after releasing the left anterior descending coronary artery undergoing 30 min occlusion, then followed by 4 h of reperfusion; and in the CQ + NaHS group rats received CQ 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection at 1 h before the I/R operation additionally on the basis of NaHS group. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure and rate-pressure product (RPP) were detected and recorded at 15 min of balance period, ischemic period, and 1, 2, 4 h after reperfusion. After reperfusion for 4 h, the rats were sacrificed and the hearts were used to calculate the range of myocardial infarction and the express of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), Cathepsin B, Beclin-1 and P62 were determined by Western blotting.

Results

The heart rates in the five groups had no siginficant differences at each time point (F=0.854, P=0.512), but the mean arterial pressure and RPP showed siginficant differences among the five groups at each time point (F=5.182, P=0.007; F=5.082, P=0.008). Furthermore, the mean arterial pressure[(87 ± 8) mmHg vs. (72 ± 10) mmHg, (91±10) mmHg vs. (63 ± 6) mmHg] and RPP [(35.4 ± 4.6)·10³ mmHg·beat/min vs. (28.7 ± 5.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min, (36.2 ± 5.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min vs. (26.8 ± 3.8)·10³ mmHg·beat/min] in the NaHS group at 2, 4 h after reperfusion were much higher than those in the I/R group (all P<0.05). The range of myocardial infarction and the express of LC3, Cathepsin B, Beclin-1 and P62 at 4 h after reperfusion all had statistical significance obviously among five groups (F=96.907, 71.164, 43.594, 57.180, 35.967, all P<0.05) , and above indicators in the NaHS group were much lower than those in the I/R group, CQ group and CQ + NaHS group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Hydrogen sulfide postconditioning play a protective role through repairinng autophagy flux in type 2 diabetic rats with I/R injury.

Key words: Hydrogen sulfide, Ischemic postconditioning, Myocardial reperfusion injury, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Autophagy, Rats

表1 各组大鼠血流动力学变化的比较（±s）

组别		例数	平衡期	缺血期	再灌注期1 h	再灌注期2 h	再灌注期4 h
心率（min^-1）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	392 ± 32	382 ± 49	393 ± 51	382 ± 37	381 ± 38
?	I/R组	8	388 ± 45	385 ± 39	379 ± 51	381 ± 41	375 ± 37
?	CQ组	8	382 ± 51	375 ± 47	382 ± 44	379 ± 58	388 ± 35
?	NaHS组	8	388 ± 47	385 ± 41	379 ± 53	381 ± 43	375 ± 39
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	380 ± 32	386 ± 57	382 ± 52	385 ± 28	377 ± 46
平均动脉压（mmHg）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	118 ± 15	115 ± 16	110 ± 10	113 ± 12	110 ± 17
?	I/R组	8	122 ± 17	102 ± 11^a	88 ± 12^a	72 ± 10^a	63 ± 6^a
?	CQ组	8	123 ± 16	108 ± 13^a	90 ± 9^a	75 ± 14^ab	65 ± 9^ab
?	NaHS组	8	125 ± 18	101 ± 9^a	99 ± 10^a	87 ± 8^ac	91 ± 10^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	124 ± 12	103 ± 12^a	92 ± 11^a	76 ± 10^ab	66 ± 12^ab
RPP（次·mmHg·10³/min）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	48.8 ± 5.8	47.8 ± 7.2	45.0 ± 7.1	45.5 ± 8.0	44.6 ± 8.3
?	I/R组	8	51.2 ± 8.2	42.3 ± 6.5^a	38.8 ± 6.3^a	28.7 ± 5.8^a	26.8 ± 3.8^a
?	CQ组	8	51.3 ± 7.8	41.9 ± 6.8^a	38.6 ± 7.1^a	28.8 ± 6.2^ab	27.4 ± 6.3^ab
?	NaHS组	8	48.8 ± 8.5	42.9 ± 7.1^a	39.9 ± 7.5^a	35.4 ± 4.6^ac	36.2 ± 5.8^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	49.5 ± 8.0	42.8 ± 8.6^a	39.4 ± 4.5^a	30.2 ± 4.6^ab	26.5 ± 4.8^ab

表1 各组大鼠血流动力学变化的比较（±s）

组别		例数	平衡期	缺血期	再灌注期1 h	再灌注期2 h	再灌注期4 h
心率（min^-1）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	392 ± 32	382 ± 49	393 ± 51	382 ± 37	381 ± 38
?	I/R组	8	388 ± 45	385 ± 39	379 ± 51	381 ± 41	375 ± 37
?	CQ组	8	382 ± 51	375 ± 47	382 ± 44	379 ± 58	388 ± 35
?	NaHS组	8	388 ± 47	385 ± 41	379 ± 53	381 ± 43	375 ± 39
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	380 ± 32	386 ± 57	382 ± 52	385 ± 28	377 ± 46
平均动脉压（mmHg）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	118 ± 15	115 ± 16	110 ± 10	113 ± 12	110 ± 17
?	I/R组	8	122 ± 17	102 ± 11^a	88 ± 12^a	72 ± 10^a	63 ± 6^a
?	CQ组	8	123 ± 16	108 ± 13^a	90 ± 9^a	75 ± 14^ab	65 ± 9^ab
?	NaHS组	8	125 ± 18	101 ± 9^a	99 ± 10^a	87 ± 8^ac	91 ± 10^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	124 ± 12	103 ± 12^a	92 ± 11^a	76 ± 10^ab	66 ± 12^ab
RPP（次·mmHg·10³/min）		?	?	?	?	?	?
?	假手术组	8	48.8 ± 5.8	47.8 ± 7.2	45.0 ± 7.1	45.5 ± 8.0	44.6 ± 8.3
?	I/R组	8	51.2 ± 8.2	42.3 ± 6.5^a	38.8 ± 6.3^a	28.7 ± 5.8^a	26.8 ± 3.8^a
?	CQ组	8	51.3 ± 7.8	41.9 ± 6.8^a	38.6 ± 7.1^a	28.8 ± 6.2^ab	27.4 ± 6.3^ab
?	NaHS组	8	48.8 ± 8.5	42.9 ± 7.1^a	39.9 ± 7.5^a	35.4 ± 4.6^ac	36.2 ± 5.8^ac
?	NaHS + CQ组	8	49.5 ± 8.0	42.8 ± 8.6^a	39.4 ± 4.5^a	30.2 ± 4.6^ab	26.5 ± 4.8^ab

图1 2型糖尿病大鼠心肌缺血区范围及梗死范围比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n= 8

图2 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白LC3表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图3 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白Cathepsin B表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图4 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白Beclin-1表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

图5 2型糖尿病大鼠缺血再灌注4 h后自噬标志蛋白P62表达变化比较。注：I/R：心肌缺血再灌注损伤（ischemia reperfusion）；CQ：氯喹（chloroquine）；NaHS：硫氢化钠（sodium hydrosulfide）；与假手术组比较，^*P<0.05；与NaHS组比较，^#P<0.05；n=4

[1]	马伟斌，江荣林，雷澍，等.半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶12在糖尿病心肌病大鼠心肌中的表达及葛根素的干预研究[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志：电子版，2012，5（1）：6-12.
[2]	Paul BD, Snyder SH. H₂S: a novel gasotransmitter that signals by sulfhydration[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 2015, 40 (11): 687-700.
[3]	Xie H, Xu Q, Jia J, et al. Hydrogen sulfide protects against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury by activating AMP-activated protein kinase to restore autophagic flux[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 458 (3): 632-638.
[4]	Rubinsztein DC, Cuervo AM, Ravikumar B, et al. In search of an "autophagomometer"[J]. Autophagy, 2009, 5 (5): 585-589.
[5]	Qiao S, Xie H, Wang C, et al. Delayed anesthetic pre-conditioning protects against myocardial infarction via activation of nuclear factor-κB and upregulation of autophagy[J]. J Anesth, 2013, 27 (2): 251-260.
[6]	Tang C, Li X, Du J. Hydrogen sulfide as a new endogenous gaseous transmitter in the cardiovascular system[J]. Curr Vasc Pharmacol, 2006, 4 (1): 17-22.
[7]	Kimura H. Hydrogen sulfide induces cyclic AMP and modulates the NMDA receptor[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2000, 267 (1): 129-133.
[8]	Liu YH, Lu M, Hu LF, et al. Hydrogen sulfide in the mammalian cardiovascular system[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2012, 17 (1): 141-185.
[9]	DiChiara J, Bliden KP, Tantry US, et al. The effect of aspirin dosing on platelet function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: an analysis from the aspirin-induced platelet effect (ASPECT) study[J]. Diabetes, 2007, 56 (12): 3014-3019.
[10]	McArdle MA, Finucane OM, Connaughton RM, et al. Mechanisms of obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance: insights into the emerging role of nutritional strategies[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2013, 4: 52.
[11]	吴玉玲，马继春，王兴程，等.外源性硫化氢对合并高血糖的大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤后的作用[J].临床心血管病杂志，2015，31（4）：451-454.
[12]	Whiteman M, Gooding KM, Whatmore JL, et al. Adiposity is a major determinant of plasma levels of the novel vasodilator hydrogen sulphide[J]. Diabetologia, 2010, 53 (8): 1722-1726.
[13]	Yan H, Du J, Tang C. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide on the pathogenesis of spontaneous hypertension in rats [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2004, 313 (1): 22-27.
[14]	Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2010, 22 (2): 124-131.
[15]	Appelqvist H, Waster P, Kagedal K, et al. The lysosome: from waste bag to potential therapeutic target[J]. J Mol Cell Bio, 2013, 5 (4): 214-226.
[16]	Ma X, Liu H, Foyil SR, et al. Impaired autophagosome clearance contributes to cardiomyocyte death in ischemia/reperfusion injury[J]. Circulation, 2012, 125 (25): 3170-3181.
[17]	Dong Y, Undyala VV, Gottlieb RA, et al. Autophagy: definition, molecular machinery, and potential role in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, 2010, 15 (3): 220-230.
[18]	Gustafsson AB, Gottlieb RA. Autophagy in ischemic heart disease[J]. Circ Res, 2009, 104 (2): 150-158.
[19]	Dorn GW 2nd. Mechanisms of non-apoptotic programmed cell death in diabetes and heart failure[J]. Cell Cycle, 2010, 9 (17): 3442-3448.
[20]	Solomon VR, Lee H. Chloroquine and its analogs: a new promise of an old drug for effective and safe cancer therapies[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2009, 625 (1-3): 220-233.

[1]	刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[2]	张刚, 秦勇, 黄超, 薛震, 吕松岑. 基于骨关节炎软骨细胞表型转化的新兴治疗靶点[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 352-362.
[3]	王颉, 周游. 二甲双胍治疗骨关节炎的机制及其研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 372-378.
[4]	王帆, 余辉, 谢佳乐, 许焕焕, 马瑞, 依日夏提·艾海提, 许珂, 许鹏. 成纤维样滑膜细胞在类风湿关节炎发病机制中的作用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 225-230.
[5]	吴杰, 周志强, 符菁, 李喜功, 张钦. 吸入性氢气对大鼠脊髓损伤后自噬及神经功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 363-371.
[6]	许彬, 王丽, 陈瑞, 沈奕, 陆件. 瞬时受体电位粘脂素1介导细胞自噬在远端缺血后处理保护大鼠脑缺血-再灌注损伤中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 180-187.
[7]	林琳, 田思萌, 于永华, 徐飞飞, 黄明莉. 干细胞及其外泌体治疗宫腔黏连的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 271-275.
[8]	李争光, 宰爽嘉, 吴火峰, 孙华, 张永博, 陈浏阳, 戴睿, 张亮. 昼夜节律相关因子在椎间盘退行性变发病机制中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 457-461.
[9]	杨文飞, 郝嘉文, 鲁梦远, 赵学刚, 李聪颖, 盖晨阳, 张晶, 张庆富. 高压电烧伤对大鼠心肌氧化应激的影响及N-乙酰半胱氨酸的干预作用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 106-112.
[10]	王卉, 薛宝睿, 李恭驰, 刘慧真, 雷霞, 李炳辉. 2型糖尿病患者下肢动脉硬化的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 147-152.
[11]	廖泽楷, 梁爱琳, 龚启梅. 根尖周病中程序性细胞死亡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 150-155.
[12]	刘锦程, 王斌, 张雯, 张明周, 刘禹, 叶东樊, 黄赞胜, 邱凌霄, 卿斌, 王创业, 王南博, 王苹, 郭宇航, 周培花, 程秋霞, 徐智. 肺泡灌洗液RASSF1A及SHOX2甲基化联合径向超声特征对肺结节性质鉴别诊断的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 505-511.
[13]	史清泉, 苗彬, 王烁, 陶琳, 沈晨. miR-181a-5p 靶向ATG5 抑制雨蛙素诱导的大鼠胰腺腺泡细胞AR42J自噬的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 524-530.
[14]	于伟伟, 张国高, 吴军, 胡俊, 黄一宁, 徐晶. 线粒体相关内质网膜相关线粒体功能障碍在阿尔茨海默病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-230.
[15]	刘霖, 张文欢, 宋雅茹, 姜云璐. Apelin-13 在阿尔茨海默病中的神经保护作用机制研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 276-280.

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	1

	来源	其他网站

	次数	1
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	26

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	9	17
比例	35%	65%

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlative study of autophagy flux and hydrogen sulfide postconditioning protecting on type 2 diabetic rats with myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury