切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 5 -10. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2025.01.002

论著

糖尿病酮症酸中毒并发急性胰腺炎患者的临床特征及预后分析
黄敏1, 代大华1, 黄红梅1, 付豹1, 傅小云1,()   
  1. 1. 563003 贵州遵义,遵义医科大学附属医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-24 出版日期:2025-02-28
  • 通信作者: 傅小云
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82360138)贵州省卫生健康委科学基金项目(gzwk2022-015)

Clinical features and prognosis of diabetic ketoacidosis combined with acute pancreatitis

Min Huang1, Dahua Dai1, Hongmei Huang1, Bao Fu1, Xiaoyun Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine,Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563003,China
  • Received:2024-10-24 Published:2025-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyun Fu
引用本文:

黄敏, 代大华, 黄红梅, 付豹, 傅小云. 糖尿病酮症酸中毒并发急性胰腺炎患者的临床特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 5-10.

Min Huang, Dahua Dai, Hongmei Huang, Bao Fu, Xiaoyun Fu. Clinical features and prognosis of diabetic ketoacidosis combined with acute pancreatitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2025, 18(01): 5-10.

目的

比较糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)并发急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的临床特征和预后,探讨其对DKA 并发AP 的预测价值。

方法

选取2017 年1 月至2023 年4 月遵义医科大学附属医院重症医学科收治的63 例DKA 患者。根据是否并发AP 将其分为DKA 组(40 例)和DKA+AP 组(23 例),对比两组患者的临床资料和预后特征。采用多因素logistic 回归分析评估DKA 并发AP 的危险因素,同时采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析其对DKA 并发AP 的预测价值并比较其曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

两组患者糖尿病诊断情况、C 反应蛋白、甘油三酯、血清钾离子(K+)、血清氯离子(Cl-)、无创呼吸机使用情况、住院总费用及3 个月内全因再入院情况比较,差异均有统计学意义(P 均<0.05)。且与DKA 组相比,DKA+AP 组患者中既往糖尿病病史不详者更多,而DKA 组患者既往患1 型糖尿病者更多(P 均<0.017)。多因素logistic 回归分析结果显示,K+[比值比(OR)=0.134,95%置信区间(CI)(0.028,0.645),P=0.012]是DKA 并发AP 的保护因素,而甘油三酯是其危险因素[OR=1.918,95%CI(1.229,2.994),P=0.004]。ROC 曲线分析显示,K+的AUC 为0.697[95%CI(0.559,0.835),P = 0.010],敏感度为0.739,特异度为0.650,截断值为3.880 mmol/L;甘油三酯的AUC 为0.878[95%CI(0.786,0.970),P <0.001],敏感度为0.957,特异度为0.675,截断值为1.940 mmol/L。甘油三酯预测DKA 并发AP 的AUC 高于K+(Z=1.964,P=0.049)。

结论

既往糖尿病病史不详的患者发生DKA 时更易并发AP;高甘油三酯是DKA 并发AP 的危险因素;高甘油三酯在预测DKA 患者并发AP 上具有一定的价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) combined with acute pancreatitis (AP),and to explore their predictive value for DKA combined with AP.

Methods

A total of 63 patients with DKA who were admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2017 to April 2023 were enrolled.According to whether AP was combined,they were divided into a DKA group (40 cases) and a DKA + AP group (23 cases),and the clinical data and prognostic characteristics of the two groups were compared.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of DKA combined with AP; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze their predictive value for DKA combined with AP and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in diabetes diagnosis,C-reactive protein,triglyceride,serum potassium (K +),serum chloride (Cl -),non-invasive ventilator use,total hospitalization cost,and all-cause readmission within 3 months between the two groups (all P <0.05).Compared with the DKA group,the DKA + AP group had more patients with unknown previous diabetes mellitus and fewer patients with type 1 diabetes (both P <0.017).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that K+ [odds ratio (OR)=0.134,95% confidence interval (CI)(0.028,0.645),P = 0.012] was a protective factor for DKA combined with AP,while triglyceride was a risk factor [OR=1.918,95%CI (1.229,2.994),P=0.004].ROC analysis showed that the AUC of K+ was 0.697 [95%CI (0.559,0.835),P=0.010],the sensitivity was 0.739,the specificity was 0.650,and the cut-off value was 3.880 mmol/L.The AUC of triglyceride was 0.878 [95%CI (0.786,0.970),P <0.001],the sensitivity was 0.957,the specificity was 0.675,and the cut-off value was 1.940 mmol / L.The AUC of triglyceride for predicting DKA combined with AP was higher than that of K+ (Z=1.964,P=0.049).

Conclusions

Patients with an unknown history of diabetes mellitus are more likely to have AP when DKA occurs.High triglycerides are risk factors for DKA combined with AP and thus have some value in predicting the concurrent AP in patients with DKA.

表1 两组DKA 患者的基线资料比较
表2 两组DKA 患者的实验室数据比较[M(P25,P75)]
组别 例数 白细胞计数(× 109 / L) 血红蛋白(g / L,xˉ ± s) CRP(mg / L) 甘油三酯(mmol / L) 血糖(mmol / L) AST(U / L) ALT(U / L)
DKA 组 40 15.4(10.2,26.3) 131 ± 32 29.6(7.3,68.0) 1.9(1.5,2.8) 30.1(17.5,43.0) 26.0(17.2,56.2) 17.0(10.2,34.2)
DKA + AP 组 23 11.4(8.6,18.1) 138 ± 28 115.2(32.9,176.9) 6.0(2.7,15.1) 22.8(19.9,30.4) 27.0(21.0,59.0) 15.0(10.0,21.0)
t / χ 2 / Z 1.606 0.906 3.926 4.990 1.185 0.557 0.622
P 0.108 0.369 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.236 0.577 0.534
组别 例数 总胆红素(μmol / L) 肌酐(μmol / L) 尿素(mmol / L) PTA(%,xˉ ± s) APTT(s) 糖化血红蛋白(μmol / L,xˉ ± s) pH 值(xˉ± s)
DKA 组 40 9.0(7.0,14.5) 85.0(59.0,146.5) 7.6(5.0,12.3) 106 ± 27 31.3(29.0,39.6) 12.1 ± 2.3 7.13 ± 0.15
DKA + AP 组 23 12.4(10.8,16.7) 71.0(45.0,143.0) 6.6(3.9,11.6) 102 ± 21 34.7(28.1,37.8) 11.6 ± 1.8 7.09 ± 0.13
t / χ 2 / Z 1.720 0.842 0.814 0.673 0.407 0.894 1.068
P 0.085 0.400 0.416 0.504 0.684 0.375 0.290
组别 例数 尿酮体[例(%)] K+(mmol / L,xˉ ± s) Na+(mmol / L) Cl-(mmol / L) Ca2+(mmol / L)
1+ 2+ 3+ 4+
DKA 组 40 3(7.5) 10(25.0) 27(67.5) 0(0.0) 4.4 ± 1.1 132.1(129.2,142.0) 101.8(96.5,106.7) 2.1(2.0,2.4)
DKA + AP 组 23 3(13.0) 2(8.7) 17(73.9) 1(4.3) 3.7 ± 1.0 138.0(130.9,143.0) 106.4(103.6,110.0) 2.1(2.0,2.3)
t / χ 2 / Z 4.238 2.492 1.292 2.435 0.843
P 0.231 0.015 0.196 0.015 0.399
表3 两组DKA 患者临床资料比较
表4 影响DKA 并发AP 发生的多因素logistic 回归分析
图1 K+与甘油三酯预测DKA 并发AP 的ROC 曲线分析 注:K+.血清钾离子;DKA.糖尿病酮症酸中毒;AP.急性胰腺炎;ROC.受试者工作特征
1
Virdi N,Poon Y,Abaniel R,et al.Prevalence,cost,and burden of diabetic ketoacidosis [J].Diabetes Technol Ther,2023,25 (S3): S75-S84.
2
Dhatariya KK,Glaser NS,Codner E,et al.Diabetic ketoacidosis[J].Nat Rev Dis Primers,2020,6 (1): 40.
3
Karslioglu French E,Donihi AC,Korytkowski MT.Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome: review of acute decompensated diabetes in adult patients[J].BMJ,2019 (365): l1114.
4
叶文慧,麦华超,陈文俊.以急腹症起病的暴发性1 型糖尿病一例[J].临床内科杂志,2021,38(4):277-278.
5
申金付,蒋瑞妹,谢树永,等.重症急性胰腺炎误以糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗1 例[J].安徽医学,2018,39(3):371-372.
6
Yadav D,Nair S,Norkus EP,et al.Nonspecific hyperamylasemiaandhyperlipasemiaindiabetic ketoacidosis: incidence and correlation with biochemical abnormalities [J].Am J Gastroenterol,2000,95 (11):3123-3128.
7
冯慧,胡杰,付豹,等.重症急性胰腺炎并糖尿病酮症酸中毒继发鼻脑型毛霉病1 例[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2018,18(5):544-546.
8
中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国高血糖危象诊断与治疗指南[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2013,5(8):449-461.
9
中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2021)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2021,20(7):730-739.
10
Garip G,Sarandol E,Kaya E.Effects of disease severity and necrosis on pancreatic dysfunction after acute pancreatitis [J].World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(44): 8065-8070.
11
Hirakuni Y,Itonaga T,Matsuda F,et al.Diabetic lipemia as a predisposing state to acute pancreatitis: a case report and literature review[J].Diabetol Int,2023,14 (3): 304-311.
12
Nair S,Yadav D,Pitchumoni CS.Association of diabetic ketoacidosis and acute pancreatitis: observations in 100 consecutive episodes of DKA [J].Am J Gastroenterol,2000,95 (10): 2795-2800.
13
Ma LP,Liu X,Cui BC,et al.Diabetic ketoacidosis with acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes in the emergency department: a retrospective study[J].Front Med (Lausanne),2022 (9): 813083.
14
Khan AA,Ata F,Yousaf Z,et al.A retrospective study on comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis patients with and without acute pancreatitis [J].Sci Rep,2023,13 (1):4347.
15
Noel RA,Braun DK,Patterson RE,et al.Increased risk of acute pancreatitis and biliary disease observed in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study[J].Diabetes Care,2009,32 (5): 834-838.
16
Nair S,Pitchumoni CS.Diabetic ketoacidosis,hyperlipidemia,and acute pancreatitis: the enigmatic triangle[J].Am J Gastroenterol,1997,92 (9): 1560-1561.
17
彭佳欣,王志宏.糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并急性胰腺炎临床指标变化特点分析[J].临床研究,2019,27(4):15-17.
18
杨君,马亚南,陆莉莉,等.徐州地区急性胰腺炎病因及临床特征分析[J].临床急诊杂志,2023,24(9):470-475.
19
苏伟,郭丰.高甘油三酯血症性胰腺炎急性期的血脂控制[J].中华消化外科杂志,2023,22(1):89-93.
20
Olesen SS,Harakow A,Krogh K,et al.Hypertriglyceridemia is often under recognized as an aetiologic risk factor for acute pancreatitis: a population-based cohort study[J].Pancreatology,2021,21 (2): 334-341.
21
Nawaz H,Koutroumpakis E,Easler J,et al.Elevated serum triglycerides are independently associated with persistent organ failure in acute pancreatitis [J].Am J Gastroenterol,2015,110 (10): 1497-1503.
22
Wang Y,Attar BM,Hinami K,et al.Concurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis: how does it affect the clinical course and severity scores?[J].Pancreas,2017,46 (10): 1336-1340.
23
Lesser PB,Warshaw AL.Diagnosis of pancreatitis masked by hyperlipemia [J].Ann Intern Med,1975,82(6): 795-798.
24
Fujishiro M,Horita A,Nakagawara H,et al.Severe hypertriglyceridemia possibly masked acute pancreatitis and led to a difficult diagnosis in an obese patient with ketoacidosis-onset type 2 diabetes[J].Intern Med,2017,56 (19): 2611-2616.
[1] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[2] 王梦洁, 张董晓. 囊性中性粒细胞性肉芽肿性乳腺炎发病机制及诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 39-44.
[3] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[4] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[5] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[6] 梁普照, 吴钰仪, 田振涛. 糖尿病继发左肾周脓肿合并脾脓肿及胸腔积液一例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 116-119.
[7] 吕奎林, 陈虹. 465 例儿童肺炎支原体肺炎的流行病学及临床特征分析:一项单中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 55-61.
[8] 陈荣荣, 丁文森, 秦二云, 王妮妮, 张青, 张诚实, 冯契靓, 刘明, 赵云峰, 汤长文. 侵袭性肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿综合征并发肝静脉血栓一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 115-120.
[9] 蒋佳君, 韦德令, 任洪冰, 朱海, 王继龙, 徐邦浩, 郭雅, 卢婷婷, 张灵, 吕自力, 文张. 全胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌安全性和疗效分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 281-289.
[10] 王欢, 王洪峰, 金重珍, 彭小芬, 金艳华, 张德伟, 张艳宁. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对腹膜透析糖尿病患者心血管疾病死亡风险的预测作用[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 7-12.
[11] 周学锋, 董哲毅, 冯哲, 蔡广研, 陈香美. 糖尿病肾脏疾病中西医结合诊疗指南计划书[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 301-305.
[12] 杜军霞, 赵小淋, 王浩然, 高志远, 王曼茜, 万楠熙, 张冬, 丁潇楠, 任琴琴, 段颖洁, 汤力, 朱晗玉. 2 型糖尿病的血液透析患者肠道微生物组学高通量测序分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 313-320.
[13] 邱晓珏, 杨婷, 赵坤豪. 生长抑素两种不同滴注方式在治疗急性胰腺炎效果的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 46-49.
[14] 赵鹏程, 陈彦, 董艳彬. 肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿患者发生侵袭综合征的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 336-340.
[15] 袁剑, 赵佩, 邓云, 邵泽民, 陈斐虹, 杨帆, 朱德生. 中老年糖尿病患者尿微量白蛋白/尿肌酐比值与脑微出血的关系分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 25-31.
阅读次数
全文


摘要