切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 244 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2021.03.014

综述

脓毒性休克初始液体复苏:该如何选择?
吴飞1, 郑瑞强2, 陈齐红3,()   
  1. 1. 225012 江苏扬州,扬州大学医学院
    2. 225001 江苏扬州,苏北人民医院重症医学科
    3. 225200 江苏扬州,扬州市江都人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-26 出版日期:2021-06-30
  • 通信作者: 陈齐红
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81670065); 江苏省社会发展重点专项(BE2017691)
  • Received:2020-12-26 Published:2021-06-30
引用本文:

吴飞, 郑瑞强, 陈齐红. 脓毒性休克初始液体复苏:该如何选择?[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 244-247.

1
Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, et al. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009-2014[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318 (13): 1241-1249.
2
Liu V, Escobar GJ, Greene JD, et al. Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts[J]. JAMA, 2014, 312 (1): 90-92.
3
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315 (8): 801-810.
4
Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, et al. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019-results from a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24 (1): 239.
5
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2017, 43 (3): 304-377.
6
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44 (6): 925-928.
7
Chang R, Holcomb JB. Choice of fluid therapy in the initial management of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock[J]. Shock, 2016, 46 (1): 17-26.
8
Uchimido R, Schmidt EP, Shapiro NI. The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23 (1): 16.
9
Hippensteel JA, Uchimido R, Tyler PD, et al. Intrave-nous fluid resuscitation is associated with septic endothelial glycocalyx degradation[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23 (1): 259.
10
Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilato-ry shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345 (8): 588-595.
11
Gelman S. Venous function and central venous pressu-re: a physiologic story[J]. Anesthesiology, 2008, 108 (4): 735-748.
12
Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic para-meters to guide fluid therapy[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2011, 1 (1): 1.
13
Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369 (9): 840-851.
14
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345 (19): 1368-1377.
15
Smith SH, Perner A. Higher vs. lower fluid volume for septic shock: clinical characteristics and outcome in unselected patients in a prospective, multicenter cohort[J]. Crit Care, 2012, 16 (3): R76.
16
The ProCESS Investigators. A randomized trial of pro-tocol-based care for early septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370 (18): 1683-1693.
17
The ARISE Investigators, the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 371 (16): 1496-1506.
18
Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372 (14): 1301-1311.
19
Macdonald SPJ, Keijzers G, Taylor DM, et al. Restri-cted fluid resuscitation in suspected sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a pilot randomised controlled trial[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44 (12): 2070-2078.
20
D'Orio V, Wahlen C, Rodriguez LM, et al. Effects of intravascular volume expansion on lung fluid balance in a canine model of septic shock[J]. Crit Care Med, 1987, 15 (9): 863-868.
21
Brooks HF, Moss RF, Davies NA, et al. Caecal liga-tion and puncture induced sepsis in the rat results in increased brain water content and perimicrovessel oedema[J]. Metab Brain Dis, 2014, 29 (3): 837-843.
22
Glassford NJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R. Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data[J]. Crit Care, 2014, 18 (6): 696.
23
Marik PE. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2014 (4): 21.
24
Byrne L, Obonyo NG, Diab SD, et al. Unintended consequences: fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, 198 (8): 1043-1054.
25
Durairaj L, Schmidt GA. Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more[J]. Chest, 2008, 133 (1): 252-263.
26
Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid management in sepsis[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2019, 34 (5): 364-373.
27
Marik PE, Byrne L, van Haren F. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12 (Suppl 1): S37-S47.
28
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39 (2): 165-228.
29
Hu B, Chen JCY, Dong Y, et al. Effect of initial infusion rates of fluid resuscitation on outcomes in patients with septic shock: a historical cohort study[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24 (1): 137.
30
方俊君,章渭方. 脓毒症早期集束化治疗的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2014,7(6):6-8.
31
Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2016, 42 (12): 1935-1947.
32
De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, et al. Alternati-ves to the Swan-Ganz catheter[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44 (6): 730-741.
33
陈星星,胡才宝,颜默磊,等. 二氧化碳偏移度对脓毒性休克患者液体复苏后微循环变化的预测价值[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2019,12(5):311-316.
34
Marik PE. Fluid responsiveness and the six guiding principles of fluid resuscitation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44 (10): 1920-1922.
35
Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369 (13): 1243-1251.
36
Hammond NE, Taylor C, Finfer S, et al. Patterns of intravenous fluid resuscitation use in adult intensive care patients between 2007 and 2014: an international cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (5): e0176292.
37
McIntyre L, Rowe BH, Walsh TS, et al. Multicountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians' fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6 (7): e010041.
38
Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults[J]. JAMA, 2012, 308 (15): 1566-1572.
39
Young P, Bailey M, Beasley R, et al. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: the SPLIT randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2015, 314 (16): 1701-1710.
40
Self WH, Semler MW, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in noncritically ill adults[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378 (9): 819-828.
41
Yokoyama T, Suwa K, Yamasaki F, et al. Intraopera-tive infusion of acetated Ringer solution containing glucose and ionized magnesium reduces ketogenesis and maintains serum magnesium[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2008, 17 (3): 525-529.
42
Pfortmueller C, Funk GC, Potura E, et al. Acetate-buffered crystalloid infusate versus infusion of 0.9% saline and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing renal transplantation: prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2017, 129 (17-18): 598-604.
43
Pfortmueller CA, Funk GC, Reiterer C, et al. Normal saline versus a balanced crystalloid for goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 120 (2): 274-283.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要