切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 152 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2019.03.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

新型布尼亚病毒感染患者25例临床特征及预后因素分析
盛棋跃1,(), 盛吉芳2, 张旋2, 叶韦玮3, 黄海军4   
  1. 1. 321000 浙江金华,金华市中心医院感染科
    2. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院感染科
    3. 322000 浙江金华,义乌市中心医院感染科
    4. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院感染科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-19 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 盛棋跃
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2017ZX10204401); 金华市科技局社会发展重点项目(2015-3-007)

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 25 patients with new bunyavirus infection

Qiyue Sheng1,(), Jifang Sheng2, Xuan Zhang2, Weiwei Ye3, Haijun Huang4   

  1. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua 321000, China
    2. Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Yiwu Central Hospital, Jinhua 322000, China
    4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2019-02-19 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiyue Sheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sheng Qiyue, Email:
引用本文:

盛棋跃, 盛吉芳, 张旋, 叶韦玮, 黄海军. 新型布尼亚病毒感染患者25例临床特征及预后因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 152-157.

Qiyue Sheng, Jifang Sheng, Xuan Zhang, Weiwei Ye, Haijun Huang. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 25 patients with new bunyavirus infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(03): 152-157.

目的

探讨新型布尼亚病毒感染的临床特点及其预后相关影响因素。

方法

选取金华地区2011年8月至2017年12月确诊的新型布尼亚病毒感染患者25例,根据患者的生存情况,将25例患者分为痊愈组(15例)与死亡组(10例)。比较痊愈组和死亡组患者的一般资料,症状体征,实验室检查包括白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、血红蛋白、血小板计数、总胆红素、直接胆红素、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、AST/ALT、肌钙蛋白I、乳酸脱氢酶、肌酸激酶、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、D-二聚体、肌酐及尿蛋白,治疗及预后情况,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析预后的相关影响因素。

结果

痊愈组出现意识障碍患者显著低于死亡组(1/15 vs. 7/10,P=0.002),AST/ALT [1.80(1.38,3.16)vs. 3.27(1.97,4.84),H=1.997,P=0.046]、肌钙蛋白I [0.04(0.02,0.25)ng/L vs. 0.63(0.49,1.19)ng/L,H=3.328,P=0.001]、肌酸激酶[836.00(318.00,1 462.00)U/L vs. 2 486.00(590.25,3 417.00)U/L,H=2.302,P=0.021]、CK-MB [33.00(25.00,52.00)U/L vs. 66.50(38.25,104.50)U/L,H=1.970,P=0.049]、PT [11.70(10.90,12.20)s vs. 14.35(12.53,15.63)s,H=2.719,P=0.007]及APTT [44.70(34.20,53.20)s vs. 79.00(60.05,105.55)s,H=3.439,P=0.001]表达水平亦均显著低于死亡组。将AST/ALT、肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶、CK-MB、PT及APTT纳入ROC曲线分析,结果显示,AST/ALT [曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.740,95%置信区间(CI)(0.525,0.955),P=0.046]、肌钙蛋白I [AUC=0.900,95%CI(0.777,0.987),P=0.001]、肌酸激酶[AUC=0.777,95%CI(0.570,0.983),P=0.021]、CK-MB [AUC=0.737,95%CI(0.519,0.954),P=0.049]、PT [AUC=0.817,95%CI(0.654,0.923),P=0.007]及APTT [AUC=0.913,95%CI(0.804,0.993),P=0.001]均对新型布尼亚病毒感染患者预后具有预测价值。其中,肌钙蛋白I和APTT的AUC分别为0.900和0.913,对预后的预测能力均较好。

结论

金华地区人感染新型布尼亚病毒患者多病情重、死亡比例高、临床症状多样,其中AST/ALT、肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶、CK-MB、PT及APTT是预后的重要影响因素。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with the new type of bunyavirus infection.

Methods

A total of 25 patients with new bunyavirus infection diagnosed in Jinhua area between August 2011 and December 2017 were selected. According to their survival, 25 patients were divided into the cure group (15 cases) and death group (10 cases). The general data, symptoms and signs, laboratory tests including the leucocyte count, neutrophile granulocyte, hemoglobin, platelet count, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AST/ALT, troponin I, lactic dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, creatinine, and urinary protein, treatment and prognosis were compared between the cure group and death group, and the related factors of prognosis were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Patients with consciousness disorder in the cure group were significantly fewer than those in the death group (1/15 vs. 7/10, P=0.002). The AST/ALT [1.80 (1.38, 3.16) vs. 3.27 (1.97, 4.84), H=1.997, P=0.046], troponin I [0.04 (0.02, 0.25) ng/L vs. 0.63 (0.49, 1.19) ng/L, H=3.328, P=0.001], creatine kinase [836.00 (318.00, 1 462.00) U/L vs. 2 486.00 (590.25, 3 417.00) U/L, H=2.302, P=0.021], CK-MB [33.00 (25.00, 52.00) U/L vs. 66.50 (38.25, 104.50) U/L, H=1.970, P=0.049], PT [11.70 (10.90, 12.20) s vs. 14.35 (12.53, 15.63) s, H=2.719, P=0.007] and APTT [44.70 (34.20, 53.20) s vs. 79.00 (60.05, 105.55) s, H=3.439, P=0.001] in the cure group were also significantly lower than those in the death group. AST/ALT, troponin I, creatine kinase, CK-MB, PT and APTT were included in the ROC analysis. The results showed that AST/ALT [area under the curve (AUC)=0.740, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.525, 0.955), P=0.046], troponin I [AUC=0.900, 95% CI (0.777, 0.987), P=0.001], creatine kinase [AUC=0.777, 95%CI (0.570, 0.983), P=0.021], CK-MB [AUC=0.737, 95%CI (0.519, 0.954), P=0.049], PT [AUC=0.817, 95%CI (0.654, 0.923), P=0.007] and APTT [AUC=0.913, 95%CI (0.804, 0.993), P=0.001] had predictive value for the prognosis of patients with the new type of bunyavirus infection. The AUCs of troponin I and APTT were 0.900 and 0.913, respectively, both of which can predict prognosis.

Conclusions

In Jinhua area, patients infected with the new type of bunyavirus had more serious illnesses, high mortality and various clinical symptoms. Among them, AST/ALT, troponin I, creatine kinase, CK-MB, PT and APTT are important prognostic factors.

表1 两组新型布尼亚病毒感染患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 两组新型布尼亚病毒感染患者实验室指标比较[MP25P75)]
组别 例数 白细胞计数(× 109/L) 中性粒细胞(%) 血红蛋白(g/L) 血小板计数(× 109/L) 总胆红素(mmol/L) 直接胆红素(mmol/L) ALT(U/L)
痊愈组 15 2.00(1.60,3.00) 63.50(51.00,76.00) 125.00(111.00,138.00) 39.00(27.00,70.00) 11.90(8.50,15.00) 5.00(3.50,8.00) 96.00(64.00,212.00)
死亡组 10 2.01(1.45,2.27) 66.00(55.15,75.50) 132.50(127.00,140.25) 29.50(25.00,48.25) 17.25(10.88,31.95) 8.25(4.42,20.25) 102.00(73.75,196.75)
χ2/H ? 0.527 0.222 1.557 0.916 1.277 1.277 0.111
P ? 0.598 0.824 0.119 0.360 0.202 0.202 0.912
组别 例数 AST(U/L) AST/ALT 肌钙蛋白I(ng/L) 乳酸脱氢酶(U/L) 肌酸激酶(U/L) CK-MB(U/L) PT(s)
痊愈组 15 221.00(183.00,665.00) 1.80(1.38,3.16) 0.04(0.02,0.25) 949.00(708.00,1 768.00) 836.00(318.00,1 462.00) 33.00(25.00,52.00) 11.70(10.90,12.20)
死亡组 10 386.50(286.75,1 021.25) 3.27(1.97,4.84) 0.63(0.49,1.19) 1 835.00(903.00,4 166.25) 2 486.00(590.25,3 417.00) 66.50(38.25,104.50) 14.35(12.53,15.63)
χ2/H ? 0.999 1.997 3.328 1.664 2.302 1.970 2.719
P ? 0.318 0.046 0.001 0.096 0.021 0.049 0.007
组别 例数 APTT(s) D-二聚体(mg/L) 肌酐(μmol/L) 尿蛋白(例)
+ ++ +++
痊愈组 15 44.70(34.20,53.20) 2.65(0.91,9.82) 96.00(69.00,101.00) 8 1 6
死亡组 10 79.00(60.05,105.55) 7.96(2.47,20.86) 98.35(74.98,131.50) 1 5 4
χ2/H ? 3.439 1.553 0.500 -
P ? 0.001 0.120 0.617 0.248
表3 ROC曲线分析新型布尼亚病毒感染患者预后相关因素
1
Yu XJ, Liang MF, Zhang SY, et al. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirns in China[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364 (16): 1523-1532.
2
Zhan J, Wang Q, Cheng J, et al. Current status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China[J]. Virol Sin, 2017, 32 (1): 51-62.
3
陈华忠,解奕瑞,阮冰. 新型布尼亚病毒感染的流行病学及诊治进展[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(6): 400-403.
4
Yun SM, Lee WG, Ryou J, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks collected from humans, South Korea, 2013[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2014, 20 (8): 1358-1361.
5
Yan M, Niu W. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2018, 18 (11): 1180-1181.
6
雷晓颖,张笑爽,于学杰. 发热伴血小板减少综合征布尼亚病毒研究进展[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(7): 967-971.
7
中华人民共和国卫生部. 发热伴血小板减少综合征防治指南(2010版)[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2011, 4(4): 193-194.
8
Wichgers Schreur PJ, Oreshkova N, Moormann RJ, et al. Creation of rift valley fever viruses with four-segmented genomes reveals flexibility in bunyavirus genome packaging[J]. J Virol, 2014, 88 (18): 10883-10893.
9
Guo CT, Lu QB, Ding SJ, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in China: an integrated data analysis[J]. Epidemiol Infect, 2016, 144 (6): 1345-1354.
10
Wang S, Li J, Niu G, et al. SFTS virus in ticks in an endemic area of China[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2015, 92 (4): 684-689.
11
Bao CJ, Guo XL, Qi X, et al. A family cluster of infections by a newly recognized bunyavirns in eastern China, 2007: further evidence of pemon - to - pemon transmission[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2011, 53 (12): 1208-1214.
12
韩玲,徐鹏,何飞. 新型布尼亚病毒致发热伴血小板减少综合征22例临床分析[J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2015, 21(2): 129-131.
13
魏艳艳,邹桂舟,叶珺, 等. 新型布尼亚病毒感染致发热伴血小板减少综合征临床特点及血常规和血清酶学分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2016, 20(5): 903-907.
14
Li H, Lu QB, Xing B, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of laboratory-diagnosed severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China, 2011-17: a prospective observational study[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2018, 18 (10): 1127-1137.
15
Deng B, Zhang S, Geng Y, et al. Cytokine and chemokine levels in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(7): e41365.
16
蒋舒玉,吕菁君,魏捷, 等. 新型布尼亚病毒感染致发热伴血小板减少综合征预后相关性分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2015, 24(4): 380-385.
17
赵海燕,孙静,严晓敏, 等. 发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的临床特点及死亡相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2016, 34(1): 15-18.
18
Yu XJ. Risk factors for death in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2018, 18 (10): 1056-1057.
19
Xu X, Sun Z, Liu J, et al. Analysis of clinical features and early warning indicators of death from severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2018 (73): 43-48.
20
Oh WS, Heo ST, Kim SH, et al. Plasma exchange and fibavirin for rapidly progressive Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2014 (18): 84-86.
21
Liu X, Zhang Y, Xu X, et al. Evaluation of plasma exchange and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for the treatment of severe avian influenza A (H7N9): a cohort study[J]. Ther Apher Dial, 2015, 19 (2): 178-184.
22
Choi S, Kim MC, Kwon JS, et al. Case report: use of plasma exchange followed by convalescent plasma therapy in a critically ill patient with severe fever and thrombocytopenia syndrome-associated encephalopathy: cytokine/chemokine concentrations, viral loads, and antibody responses[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2018, 99 (6): 1466-1468.
23
Oh WS, Yoo JR, Kwon KT, et al. Effect of early plasma exchange on survival in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a multicenter study[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2017, 58 (4): 867-871.
24
韩亚萍,董莉,孔练花, 等. 病毒载量和细胞因子在发热伴血小板减少综合征致病机制中的作用[J].中华传染病杂志, 2014, 32(9): 538-544.
25
胡琴,石泽亚,隆艳飞, 等. 医护一体化模式在新型布尼亚病毒重症感染患者器官功能支持中的应用[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(1): 45-47.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[8] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[9] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[10] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[11] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[12] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要