老年人大便性状与肠道菌群的相关性分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.04.001

目的

比较老年人不同大便性状与肠道菌群间的相关性。

方法

将23例老年患者根据bristol大便分型分成便秘组（13例）及便溏组（10例），并同期选择9例健康人群为对照组。留取新鲜粪便样本并提取DNA，对细菌16S rDNA基因V4区进行粪便微生物DNA测序，对测序结果进行生物信息学分析。同时，采用酶联免疫吸附试验（ELISA）检测肿瘤坏死因子α（TNF-α）、白细胞介素10（IL-10）、IL-17、IL-22、白三烯B4（LTB-4）及前列腺素E2（PGE2）水平。采用Spearman法分析肠道菌群相对丰度与大便性状的相关性。

结果

三组患者间Shannon指数和Simpson指数比较，差异均有统计学意义（H= 8.449，P= 0.015；H= 6.884，P= 0.032），且便秘组患者Shannon指数[6.4（5.8，6.6）vs. 5.0（4.8，5.6）]和Simpson指数[0.95（0.93，0.97）vs. 0.88（0.83，0.94）]均显著高于便溏组患者（P均< 0.05）。但三组患者间Ace指数和Chao指数比较，差异均无统计学意义（H= 3.821，P= 0.148；H= 3.516，P= 0.172）。三组患者间柯林斯均属（H= 6.599，P= 0.037）、丁酸弧菌属（H = 8.707，P = 0.013）、嗜胆菌属（H = 7.354，P = 0.025）、厌氧棍状均属（H = 6.179，P = 0.046）、巨球形均属（H= 6.095，P= 0.047）的相对丰度比较，差异均有统计学意义。而三组患者间TNF-α、IL-10、IL-17、IL-22、LTB-4及PGE2的比较，差异均无统计学意义（F = 0.442、1.034、3.217、0.957、0.595、1.440，P均> 0.05）。同时，柯林斯菌属、丁酸弧菌属、嗜胆菌属、厌氧棍状菌属与大便稠度显著正相关（r= 0.455、0.415、0.449、0.411，P= 0.009、0.018、0.010、0.019）。

结论

在老年人中，大便性状的不同与肠道菌群的变化有关。

关键词: 粪便, 菌群, 肠道, 老年人

Objective

To investigate the relationship between fecal characteristics and intestinal microflora in the elderly.

Methods

Totally 23 elderly patients were divided into the constipation group (13 cases) and loose stool group (10 cases) according to bristol stool classification, and 9 healthy people were enrolled as the control group. Fresh fecal samples were taken and DNA was extracted. The bacterial microbial DNA was sequenced in the V4 region of 16S rDNA gene, and the sequencing results were analyzed by bioinformatics. The enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) was adopted to detect levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 10 (IL-10), IL-17, IL-22, leukotriene B4 (LTB-4), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The Spearman method was used to analyze the relationship between fecal characteristics and in testinal microflora.

Results

Shannon and Simpson indices were significantly different among three groups (H= 8.449, P= 0.015; H= 6.884, P= 0.032), and the Shannon index [6.4 (5.8, 6.6) vs. 5.0 (4.8, 5.6)] and Simpson index [0.95 (0.93, 0.97) vs. 0.88 (0.83, 0.94)] were significantly higher in the constipation group than in loose stool group (both P< 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in Ace and Chao indices among three groups (H= 3.821, P= 0.148; H= 3.516, P= 0.172). The relative abundance of Collinsella (H= 6.599, P= 0.037), Anaerostipes (H= 8.707, P= 0.013), Bilophila (H= 7.354, P= 0.025), Anaerotruncus (H= 6.179, P= 0.046) and Megasphaera (H= 6.095, P= 0.047) was significantly different among three groups. The levels of TNF-α, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22, LTB-4 and PGE2 showed no significant differences among them (F= 0.442, 1.034, 3.217, 0.957, 0.595, 1.440; all P> 0.05). Meanwhile, the abundance of Collinsella, Anaerostipes, Bilophila and Anaerotruncus was positively correlated with stool consistency (r= 0.455, 0.415, 0.449, 0.411; P= 0.009, 0.018, 0.010, 0.019) .

Conclusion

Fecal characteristics is associated with intestinal microflora in the elderly.

Key words: Feces, Microflora, Intestinal tract, Aged

表1 三组老年患者间菌群丰富度和多样性的比较[M（P₂₅，P₇₅）]

组别	例数	Ace指数	Chao指数	Shannon指数	Simpson指数
便溏组	10	1 653(1 432,1 882)	1 670(1 540,1 888)	5.0(4.8,5.6)	0.88(0.83,0.94)
对照组	9	1 864(1 482,1 956)	1 772(1 512,1 900)	6.1(5.2,6.3)	0.95(0.92,0.96)
便秘组	13	1 936(1 841,2 209)	1 867(1 808,2 153)	6.4(5.8,6.6)^a	0.95(0.93,0.97)^a
H值	?	3.821	3.516	8.449	6.884
P值	?	0.148	0.172	0.015	0.032

表1 三组老年患者间菌群丰富度和多样性的比较[M（P₂₅，P₇₅）]

组别	例数	Ace指数	Chao指数	Shannon指数	Simpson指数
便溏组	10	1 653(1 432,1 882)	1 670(1 540,1 888)	5.0(4.8,5.6)	0.88(0.83,0.94)
对照组	9	1 864(1 482,1 956)	1 772(1 512,1 900)	6.1(5.2,6.3)	0.95(0.92,0.96)
便秘组	13	1 936(1 841,2 209)	1 867(1 808,2 153)	6.4(5.8,6.6)^a	0.95(0.93,0.97)^a
H值	?	3.821	3.516	8.449	6.884
P值	?	0.148	0.172	0.015	0.032

表2 三组老年患者菌群相对丰度的比较[M（P₂₅，P₇₅）]

组别	例数	柯林斯均属(%)	丁酸弧菌属(%)	嗜胆菌属(%)	厌氧棍状菌属（‰）	巨球形菌属(%)
便溏组	10	0.12(0.11,0.19)	0.016(0.093,0.035)	0.06(0.03,0.24)	0.029(0.019,0.081)	0.123(0.020,0.386)
对照组	9	0.17(0.06,0.90)	0.074(0.029,0.160)^a	0.19(0.17,0.34)	0.144(0.057,0.164)^a	0.350(0.096,0.762)
便秘组	13	0.28(0.21,0.38)^a	0.077(0.045,0.119)^a	0.30(0.14,0.45)^a	0.077(0.059,0.199)	0.048(0.020,0.170)^b
H值	?	6.599	8.707	7.354	6.179	6.095
P值	?	0.037	0.013	0.025	0.046	0.047

表2 三组老年患者菌群相对丰度的比较[M（P₂₅，P₇₅）]

组别	例数	柯林斯均属(%)	丁酸弧菌属(%)	嗜胆菌属(%)	厌氧棍状菌属（‰）	巨球形菌属(%)
便溏组	10	0.12(0.11,0.19)	0.016(0.093,0.035)	0.06(0.03,0.24)	0.029(0.019,0.081)	0.123(0.020,0.386)
对照组	9	0.17(0.06,0.90)	0.074(0.029,0.160)^a	0.19(0.17,0.34)	0.144(0.057,0.164)^a	0.350(0.096,0.762)
便秘组	13	0.28(0.21,0.38)^a	0.077(0.045,0.119)^a	0.30(0.14,0.45)^a	0.077(0.059,0.199)	0.048(0.020,0.170)^b
H值	?	6.599	8.707	7.354	6.179	6.095
P值	?	0.037	0.013	0.025	0.046	0.047

表3 三组老年患者间炎症因子表达水平的比较（±s）

组别	例数	TNF-α(μg/L)	IL-10(ng/L)	IL-17(ng/L)	IL-22(ng/L)	LTB-4(ng/L)	PGE2(ng/L)
便溏组	10	979 ± 919	15.8 ± 1.5	10.3 ± 1.5	47 ± 33	13.1 ± 2.2	42 ± 29
对照组	9	1 998 ± 3 516	16.4 ± 2.2	13.4 ± 1.9	42 ± 22	14.2 ± 2.1	31 ± 5
便秘组	13	1 496 ± 2 102	14.0 ± 3.9	13.0 ± 3.9	65 ± 54	13.0 ± 3.1	29 ± 6
H值	?	0.442	1.034	3.217	0.957	0.595	1.440
P值	?	0.647	0.378	0.057	0.396	0.559	0.256

表3 三组老年患者间炎症因子表达水平的比较（±s）

组别	例数	TNF-α(μg/L)	IL-10(ng/L)	IL-17(ng/L)	IL-22(ng/L)	LTB-4(ng/L)	PGE2(ng/L)
便溏组	10	979 ± 919	15.8 ± 1.5	10.3 ± 1.5	47 ± 33	13.1 ± 2.2	42 ± 29
对照组	9	1 998 ± 3 516	16.4 ± 2.2	13.4 ± 1.9	42 ± 22	14.2 ± 2.1	31 ± 5
便秘组	13	1 496 ± 2 102	14.0 ± 3.9	13.0 ± 3.9	65 ± 54	13.0 ± 3.1	29 ± 6
H值	?	0.442	1.034	3.217	0.957	0.595	1.440
P值	?	0.647	0.378	0.057	0.396	0.559	0.256

1	Chong AM. Promoting the psychosocial health of the elderly-the role of social workers[J]. Soc Work Health Care, 2007, 44(1-2): 91-109.
2	Beard JR,Officer A,de Carvalho IA, et al. The Wo-rld report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10033): 2145-2154.
3	Suares NC,Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2011, 106(9): 1582-1591.
4	Sanchez MI,Bercik P. Epidemiology and burden of chronic constipation[J]. Can J Gastroenterol, 2011 (25 Suppl B): 11B-15B.
5	Chang JY,Locke GR 3rd,McNally MA, et al. Impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on survival in the community[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010, 105(4): 822-832.
6	O'Hara AM,Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ[J]. EMBO Rep, 2006, 7(7): 688-693.
7	Sommer F,Backhed F. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2013, 11(4): 227-238.
8	Cani PD,Bibiloni R,Knauf C, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice[J]. Diabetes, 2008, 57(6): 1470-1481.
9	Ni J,Wu GD,Albenberg L, et al. Gut microbiota and IBD: causation or correlation?[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 14(10): 573-584.
10	Guarner F,Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease[J]. Lancet, 2003, 361(9356): 512-519.
11	Posserud I,Stotzer PO,Bjornsson ES, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Gut, 2007, 56(6): 802-808.
12	Lozupone CA,Stombaugh JI,Gordon JI, et al. Dive-rsity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota[J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 220-230.
13	Cho I,Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2012, 13(4): 260-270.
14	Bouhnik Y,Neut C,Raskine L, et al. Prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial to evaluate the effects of lactulose and polyethylene glycol-4000 on colonic flora in chronic idiopathic constipation[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2004, 19(8): 889-899.
15	Silk DB,Davis A,Vulevic J, et al. Clinical trial: the effects of a trans-galactooligosaccharide prebiotic on faecal microbiota and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 29(5): 508-518.
16	Gomez-Arango LF,Barrett HL,Wilkinson SA, et al. Low dietary fiber intake increases Collinsella abundance in the gut microbiota of overweight and obese pregnant women [J]. Gut microbes, 2018, 9(3): 189-201.
17	Locke GR 3rd,Pemberton JH,Phillips SF. American gastroenterological association medical position statement: guidelines on constipation[J]. Gastroenterology, 2000, 119(6): 1761-1766.
18	Gallegos-Orozco JF,Foxx-Orenstein AE,Sterler SM, et al. Chronic constipation in the elderly[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107(1): 18-25.
19	Vandeputte D,Falony G,Vieira-Silva S, et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates[J]. Gut, 2016, 65(1): 57-62.
20	Burton KJ,Rosikiewicz M,Pimentel G, et al. Probiotic yogurt and acidified milk similarly reduce postprandial inflammation and both alter the gut microbiota of healthy, young men[J]. Br J Nutr, 2017, 117(9): 1312-1322.
21	Closa-Monasterolo R,Ferré N,Castillejo-DeVillasante G, et al. The use of inulin-type fructans improves stool consistency in constipated children. A randomised clinical trial: pilot study[J]. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2017, 68(5): 587-594.
22	Roberfroid MB. Prebiotics and probiotics: are they fun-ctional foods?[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2000, 71(6 Suppl): 1682S-1687S; discussion 1688S-1690S.
23	Vandeputte D,Falony G,Vieira-Silva S, et al. Prebiotic inulin-type fructans induce specific changes in the human gut microbiota[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(11): 1968-1974.
24	Rivière A,Selak M,Lantin D, et al. Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut[J]. Front Microbiol, 2016 (7): 979.
25	Bothe MK,Maathuis AJH,Bellmann S, et al. Dose-dependent prebiotic effect of lactulose in a computer-controlled in vitro model of the human large intestine [J]. Nutrients, 2017, 9(7): pii: E767.
26	Sato T,Kusuhara S,Yokoi W, et al. Prebiotic potential of L-sorbose and xylitol in promoting the growth and metabolic activity of specific butyrate-producing bacteria in human fecal culture[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2017, 93(1): pii: fiw227. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
27	Feghali CA,Wright TM. Cytokines in acute and chronic inflammation[J]. Front Biosci, 1997 (2): d12-d26.
28	Liebregts T,Adam B,Bredack C, et al. Immune activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome [J]. Gastroenterology, 2007, 132(3): 913-920.
29	Coskun M,Vermeire S,Nielsen OH. Novel targeted therapies for inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2017, 38(2): 127-142.
30	Rooks MG,Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2016, 16(6): 341-352.
31	Seyedmirzaee S,Hayatbakhsh MM,Ahmadi B, et al. Serum immune biomarkers in irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2016, 40(5): 631-637.
32	Hughes PA,Harrington AM,Castro J, et al. Sensory neuro-immune interactions differ between irritable bowel syndrome subtypes[J]. Gut, 2013, 62(10): 1456-1465.

[1]	李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2]	甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[3]	钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[4]	晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[5]	刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[6]	代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[7]	何吉鑫, 杨燕妮, 王继伟, 李建国, 谢铭. 肠道菌群及肠道代谢产物参与慢性便秘发生机制的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 495-499.
[8]	王宁, 刘彦哲, 吴紫莺, 曾超, 雷光华, 沙婷婷, 王伊伦. 基于孟德尔随机化研究探讨肠道菌群与肌少症表型的因果关联[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 333-342.
[9]	单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[10]	孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
[11]	屈霄, 王靓, 陆萍, 何斌, 孙敏. 外周血炎症因子及肠道菌群特征与活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者病情的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 466-470.
[12]	姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13]	郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14]	张大涯, 陈世锔, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 李达, 白飞虎. 肠道微生物群对代谢相关脂肪性肝病发展的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 828-833.
[15]	高红琴, 陈晨, 陆瑞科, 王小雨, 张敏, 李少华, 郝梨岚, 黄新程, 关凌耀, 张韵红. 外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病对女性阴道-宫颈菌群的影响研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-725.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlation between fecal characteristics and intestinal microflora in the elderly

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Correlation between fecal characteristics and intestinal microflora in the elderly