切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 303 -308. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2017.05.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

血清β淀粉样蛋白1-42在儿童铅中毒中的表达及临床意义
金益梅1,(), 黄爱蓉1, 梁冬施1   
  1. 1. 325027 浙江温州,温州医科大学附属第二医院&育英儿童医院儿童急诊综合病房
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-26 出版日期:2017-10-01
  • 通信作者: 金益梅
  • 基金资助:
    温州市科技局课题项目(Y20160237)

Expression and clinical significance of serum amyloid beta-protein1-42 in children with lead poisoning

Yimei Jin1,(), Airong Huang1, Dongshi Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
  • Received:2017-02-26 Published:2017-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yimei Jin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jin Yimei, Email:
引用本文:

金益梅, 黄爱蓉, 梁冬施. 血清β淀粉样蛋白1-42在儿童铅中毒中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(05): 303-308.

Yimei Jin, Airong Huang, Dongshi Liang. Expression and clinical significance of serum amyloid beta-protein1-42 in children with lead poisoning[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(05): 303-308.

目的

研究血清β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)1-42在铅中毒患儿中的表达及其与血铅浓度的相关性。

方法

根据血铅浓度将84例铅中毒患儿分为轻度(40例)、中度(26例)和重度(18例)三组,同时选取同期健康体检的儿童为对照组(28例)。用原子吸收法测定受试者微量元素五项(包括血铅浓度),酶联免疫吸附测定法检测受试者血清Aβ1-42水平,并采用智力量表评估患儿智力水平。二巯基丙磺酸钠针治疗后,检测患儿血铅浓度和血清Aβ1-42水平。Pearson相关系数进行相关性分析。

结果

治疗前,四组受试儿童血铅浓度和血清Aβ1-42水平的比较,差异均有统计学意义(F = 969.367、136.678,P均< 0.05);随着铅中毒程度的增加,各组血铅浓度和血清Aβ1-42水平也逐级增加(P均< 0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示血铅浓度与血清Aβ1-42水平存在正相关(r = 0.893,P < 0.001)。轻度[(219 ± 15)μg/L vs.(174 ± 15)μg/L]、中度[(289 ± 43)μg/L vs.(213 ± 43)μg/L]、重度组[(489 ± 40)μg/L vs.(378 ± 44)μg/L]治疗前后血铅浓度的比较,差异均有统计学意义(t = 15.295、10.130、9.237,P均< 0.05);同时,轻度[(326 ± 43)ng/L vs.(301 ± 33)ng/L]、中度[(392 ± 60)ng/L vs.(342 ± 63)ng/L]、重度组[(515 ± 62)ng/L vs.(447 ± 54)ng/L]治疗前后血清Aβ1-42水平下降,也均有显著性差异(t = 7.205、4.350、7.712,P均< 0.05)。不同年龄段铅中毒患儿随铅中毒程度增加,智力量表评分也逐级降低,存在显著性差异(P均< 0.05)。

结论

血清Aβ1-42水平可评估铅中毒对神经系统的损害,对于年长儿童可结合智力评估进行综合评价。

Objective

To investigate the expression of serum amyloid beta-protein (Aβ)1-42 in children with lead poisoning and its relationship with the blood lead level.

Methods

Totally 84 cases of children with lead poisoning were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the blood lead levels: the mild group (n = 40), the moderate group (n = 26) and the severe group (n = 18). Meanwhile, 28 healthy children were selected as the control group. Five trace elements (including the blood lead level) were determined by the atomic absorption method; serum levels of Aβ1-42 were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The intelligence scale was to assess children patients' intelligence. After sodium dimercaptosulphonate treatment, the blood lead level and serum Aβ1-42 concentration in children patients were also detected. The correlation was analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results

Before treatment, there were significant differences of the blood lead level and serum Aβ1-42 concentration existing in four groups (F = 969.367, 136.678; all P < 0.05); as the level of lead poisoning increased, the blood lead concentration and serum Aβ1-42 in each group increased as well. The blood lead level and serum Aβ1-42 had positive correlation by Pearson correlation analysis (r = 0.893, P < 0.001). Before and after treatment, the blood lead levels in the mild [(219 ± 15) μg/L vs. (174 ± 15) μg/L], moderate [(289 ± 43) μg/L vs. (213 ± 43) μg/L], and severe [(489 ± 40) μg/L vs. (378 ± 44) μg/L] groups changed significantly (t = 15.295, 10.130, 9.237; all P < 0.05); the serum Aβ1-42 concentrations in the mild [(326 ± 43) ng/L vs. (301 ± 33) ng/L], moderate [(392 ± 60) ng/L vs. (342 ± 63) ng/L], and severe [(515 ± 62) ng/L vs. (447 ± 54) ng/L] groups decreased significantly (t = 7.205, 4.350, 7.712; all P < 0.05). With the increased degree of lead poisoning in children patients at different ages, the score of the intelligence scale decreased significantly (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The serum Aβ1-42 level can evaluate neurotoxicity caused by lead poisoning. It is an effective way combined with intelligence evaluation in older children.

表1 受试儿童血铅浓度和血清Aβ1-42水平的比较( ± s
图1 各组铅中毒患儿智力评估的比较图(n = 56)。注:与轻度组比较,*P < 0.05;与中度组比较,#P < 0.05
1
Rahman A, Khan KM, Al-Khaledi G, et al. Over activation of hippocampal serine/threonine protein phosphatases PP1 and PP2A is involved in lead-induced deficits in learning and memory in young rats[J]. Neurotoxicology, 2012, 33 (3): 370-383.
2
Wirbisky SE, Weber GJ, Lee JW, et al. Novel dose-dependent alterations in excitatory GABA during embryonic development associated with lead (Pb) neurotoxicity[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2014, 229 (1): 1-8.
3
Gu H, Wei X, Monnot AD, et al. Lead exposure increases levels of beta-amyloid in the brain and CSF and inhibits LRP1 expression in APP transgenic mice[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2011, 490 (1): 16-20.
4
中华人民共和国卫生部. 卫生部关于印发《儿童高铅血症和铅中毒预防指南》及《儿童高铅血症和铅中毒分级和处理原则(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2006-02-27)[2017-02-01].

URL    
5
Xie X, Ding G, Cui C, et al. The effects of low-level prenatal lead exposure on birth outcomes[J]. EnvironPollut, 2013 (175): 30-34.
6
Lin S, Wang X, Yu IT, et al. Environmental lead pollution and elevated blood lead levels among children in a rural area of China[J]. Am J Public Health, 2011, 101 (5): 834-841.
7
Oulhote Y, LeTertre A, Etchevers A, et al. Implications of different residential lead standards on children's blood lead levels in France: predictions based on a national cross-sectional survey[J]. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2013, 216 (6): 743-750.
8
Krieg EF Jr, Feng HA. The relationships between blood lead levels and serum follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002[J]. Reprod Toxicol, 2011, 32 (3): 277-285.
9
章满红,梁俊,杨琼. 急诊医疗信息系统的设计策略分析[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2015,8(3):189-190.
10
Cao J, Li M, Wang Y, et al. Environmental lead exposure among preschool children in Shanghai, China: blood lead levels and risk factors[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (12): e113297.
11
Kennedy C, Lordo R, Sucosky MS, et al. Primary prevention of lead poisoning in children: a cross-sectional study to evaluate state specific lead-based paint risk reduction laws in preventing lead poisoning in children[J]. Environ Health, 2014 (13): 93.
12
王若禺,杨克敌,王松,等. 家长对儿童铅中毒认知程度的调查[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版),2013,42(4):487-489.
13
Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A. Toxicity of lead: a review with recent updates[J]. Interdiscip Toxicol, 2012, 5 (2): 47-58.
14
Kasten-Jolly J, Heo Y, Lawrence DA. Central nervous system cytokine gene expression: modulation by lead[J]. J Biochem Mol Toxicol, 2011, 25 (1): 41-54.
15
Hou S, Yuan L, Jin P, et al. A clinical study of the effects of lead poisoning on the intelligence and neurobehavioral abilities of children[J]. Theor Biol Med Model, 2013 (10): 13.
16
Basha DC, Rani MU, Devi CB, et al. Perinatal lead exposure alters postnatal cholinergic and aminergic system in rat brain: reversal effect of calcium co-administration[J]. Int J Dev Neurosci, 2012, 30 (4): 343-350.
17
Jusko TA, Henderson CR, Lanphear BP, et al. Blood lead concentrations < 10 μg/dL and child intelligence at 6 years of age[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2008, 116 (2): 243-248.
18
Wei Y, Liu JG, Li H, et al. Research progress on interactions among γ-secretase, amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1 in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Chin Pharmacol Bull, 2014, 30 (2): 167-169.
19
Ueno M, Chiba Y, Matsumoto K, et al. Clearance of beta-amyloid in the brain[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2014, 21 (35): 4085-4090.
20
胡宝吉,薄禄龙,宋颖,等. 脓毒症相关性神经功能障碍的病理生理过程[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2015,8(3):197-200.
21
胡海燕. β-淀粉样蛋白在阿尔茨海默病中的作用及中药多靶点对抗研究进展[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2012(3):488-492.
22
Bihaqi SW, Bahmani A, Subaiea GM, et al. Infantile exposure to lead and late-age cognitive decline: relevance to AD[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2014, 10 (2): 187-195.
23
李颖,刘亚庆,聂琛. 铅与Aβ的蓄积机制的研究进展[J]. 中国当代医药,2011,18(6):14.
24
Gu H, Robison G, Hong L, et al. Increased β-amyloid deposition in Tg-SWDI transgenic mouse brain following in vivo lead exposure[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2012, 213 (2): 211-219.
25
Gu H, Wei X, Monnot AD, et al. Lead exposure increases levels of beta-amyloid in the brain and CSF and inhibits LRP1 expression in APP transgenic mice [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2011, 490 (1): 16-20.
26
崔卫刚,李海斌,王松涛,等. 铅对小鼠海马β-位点-淀粉样前体蛋白剪切酶-1和Bax及β淀粉样蛋白42蛋白表达以及学习记忆能力的影响[J]. 环境与健康杂志,2012,29(7):623-626.
27
Behl M, Zhang Y, Shi YZ, et al. Lead-induced accumulation of β-amyloid in the choroid plexus: role of low density lipoprotein receptor protein-1 and protein kinase C[J]. Neurotoxicology, 2010, 31 (5): 524-532.
28
Kianoush S, Sadeghi M, Balali-Mood M. Recent advances in the clinical management of lead poisoning[J]. Acta Med Iran, 2015, 53 (6): 327-336.
29
郭利涛,王雪. 血液灌流联合二巯基丙磺酸钠救治急性铅中毒一例[J]. 中国全科医学,2010,13(9):1019.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[3] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[4] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[5] 陈桂华, 钟小玲, 谢雨, 王慧, 谢江, 杨涛毅. 合并肝脏疾病特殊健康状态儿童疫苗预防接种及时性临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 431-439.
[6] 刘静, 王燕妮, 王继萍. 儿童毛发移植应用前景及病例讨论[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 368-368.
[7] 张梦思, 麻艺群, 蒙礼娟, 朱辉, 付晋凤. 压力手套与指蹼加压带及泡沫型硅凝胶贴膜联合应用于儿童瘢痕性并指术后的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 329-334.
[8] 郑宝英, 黄小兰, 贾楠, 朱春梅. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎早期预警指标[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 215-221.
[9] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[10] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[11] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[12] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 陈晓胜, 何佳, 刘方, 吴蕊, 杨海涛, 樊晓寒. 直立倾斜试验诱发31 秒心脏停搏的植入心脏起搏器儿童一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 488-494.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要