切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华危重症医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 289 -293. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2016.05.001

所属专题: 文献

创伤专题

经颅多谱勒超声联合脑室型有创颅内压监测在创伤性双侧大脑半球弥漫性脑肿胀患者救治中的作用
龙连圣1,(), 王伟1, 王聪1, 辛志成1, 李夏良1, 蒋超超1, 吴钟华1, 苏强1, 章元1, 胡夷1, 施顺孝1, 范顺志1   
  1. 1. 313000 浙江湖州,安徽医科大学解放军九八临床学院解放军第98医院神经外二科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-28 出版日期:2016-10-01
  • 通信作者: 龙连圣
  • 基金资助:
    2011年南京军区医学科技创新经费资助项目(11Z002)

Effect of the combination of transcranial Doppler and invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of post-traumatic bilateral cerebral hemisphere diffuse brain swelling patients

Liansheng Long1,(), Wei Wang1, Cong Wang1, Zhicheng Xin1, Xialiang Li1, Chaochao Jiang1, Zhonghua Wu1, Qiang Su1, Yuan Zhang1, Yi Hu1, Shunxiao Shi1, Shunzhi Fan1   

  1. 1. Second Department of Neurosurgery, the 98th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 98 Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Huzhou 313000, China
  • Received:2016-07-28 Published:2016-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Liansheng Long
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Long Liansheng, Email:
引用本文:

龙连圣, 王伟, 王聪, 辛志成, 李夏良, 蒋超超, 吴钟华, 苏强, 章元, 胡夷, 施顺孝, 范顺志. 经颅多谱勒超声联合脑室型有创颅内压监测在创伤性双侧大脑半球弥漫性脑肿胀患者救治中的作用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 289-293.

Liansheng Long, Wei Wang, Cong Wang, Zhicheng Xin, Xialiang Li, Chaochao Jiang, Zhonghua Wu, Qiang Su, Yuan Zhang, Yi Hu, Shunxiao Shi, Shunzhi Fan. Effect of the combination of transcranial Doppler and invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of post-traumatic bilateral cerebral hemisphere diffuse brain swelling patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(05): 289-293.

目的

探讨经颅多谱勒超声(TCD)联合脑室型有创颅内压(ICP)监测在创伤性急性双侧大脑半球弥漫性脑肿胀(PADBS)患者救治中的作用及对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2015年12月解放军第98医院神经外二科在TCD联合脑室型有创ICP监测下救治的42例PADBS患者的临床资料。患者入院后2 h内行TCD及脑室型有创ICP监测,按入院首次ICP值分为ICP ≤ 25 mmHg组(27例)和ICP >25 mmHg组(15例),同时按入院时首次TCD监测的脑搏动指数,分为脑搏动指数≤ 1.4组(18例)及脑搏动指数>1.4组(24例)。同时按伤后6个月格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)对患者预后进行评价。比较入院时不同ICP组及脑搏动指数组的预后情况。

结果

PADBS患者入院首次ICP值15~46 mmHg,平均ICP为(24 ± 7)mmHg;入院首次脑搏动指数值1.21~3.31,平均脑搏动指数为1.7 ± 0.5。患者预后良好20例,中度残疾14例,重度残疾3例,植物生存3例,死亡2例。PADBS患者入院首次ICP ≤ 25 mmHg组预后优于ICP > 25 mmHg组患者[92.59%(25/27)vs. 60.00%(15/25),χ2 = 4.695,P < 0.05]。入院首次脑搏动指数≤ 1.4组18例患者预后明显优于脑搏动指数> 1.4组患者[83.33%(15/18)vs. 79.16%(19/24),χ2 = 0.003,P> 0.05]。

结论

TCD联合脑室型有创ICP监测对PADBS患者的临床救治有指导作用,且对患者预后有预测作用,其中入院首次ICP ≤ 25 mmHg的PADBS患者预后较好。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect and prognosis prediction of the combination of transcranial Doppler (TCD) and ventricular invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in the treatment of post-traumatic acute bilateral cerebral hemisphere diffuse brain swelling (PADBS) patients.

Methods

Forty-two PADBS patients who admitted to Second Department of Neurosurgery, the 98th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army from March 2013 to December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective study. They all accepted TCD and ventricular ICP monitoring within 2 h after admission. According to the initial ICP, patients were divided into the ICP ≤ 25 mmHg group (27 cases) and ICP> 25 mmHg group (15 cases). In addition, according to the brain pulsatility index (PI) detected by initial TCD after admission, patients were divided into the PI ≤ 1.4 group (18 cases) and PI> 1.4 (24 cases). Clinical outcome was determined based on the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) 6 months after injury. The prognosis were compared between the different ICP groups and PI groups.

Results

The initial ICP of PADBS patients were 15-46 mmHg (mean: 24 ± 7 mmHg) after admission, and the initial PI were 1.21-3.31 (mean: 1.7 ± 0.5). Twenty cases recovered well, 14 cases had moderate disability, 3 cases had severe disability, 3 cases were at persistent vegetative state and 2 cases died. Twenty-five patients in the ICP ≤ 25 mmHg group and 9 patients in the ICP> 25 mmHg group recovered well. More patients in the ICP ≤ 25 mmHg group recovered well as compared with the ICP> 25 mmHg group [92.59% (25/27) vs. 60.00% (15/25), χ2 = 4.695, P< 0.05]. Fifteen patients in the PI ≤ 1.4 group and 19 patients in the PI> 1.4 group recovered well [83.33% (15/18) vs. 79.16% (19/24), χ2 = 0.003, P> 0.05].

Conclusions

The combination of TCD and ventricular invasive ICP monitoring could guide the clinical treatment for PADBS patients, and also help to predict the prognosis. The PADBS patients, with the initial ICP ≤ 25 mmHg at admission, generally had a better prognosis.

1
Chen K,Dong J,Xia T, et al. Changes in cerebral hemodynamics in patients with posttraumatic diffuse brain swelling after external intraventricular drainage[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2015, 18(2): 90-94.
2
李欢,郝淑煜,马骏, 等. 双额大骨瓣减压术对外伤后难治性弥漫性脑肿胀的疗效观察[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(2):129-133.
3
王忠诚. 王忠诚神经外科学[M]. 第1版. 武汉: 湖北科学技术出版, 2005.
4
Marshall LF,Marshall SB,Klauber MR, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography[J]. J Neurotrauma, 1992(9 Supp l): S287-S292.
5
中国医师协会神经外科医师分会, 中国神经创伤专家委员会. 中国颅脑创伤颅内压监测专家共识[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2011, 27(10):1073-1074.
6
梁玉敏,曹铖,江基尧. 颅脑创伤中的颅内压监测-放弃还是新的开始[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(9):964-966.
7
江基尧. 加强我国颅脑创伤临床规范化治疗[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2006, 22(2):71.
8
王林国,俞文华,董晓巧, 等. 血浆和肽素浓度对重型颅脑损伤后急性创伤性凝血病的预测价值[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2015, 8(5):300-305.
9
阳建国,汪一棋,赵朝辉, 等. 脉搏指数连续心输出量技术在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用分析[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2016, 9(1):44-46.
10
吴晓翔. 双额大骨瓣减压术在外伤后难治性弥漫性脑肿胀患者中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2015, 43(3):226-228.
11
许爱刚,王一芳,赖福生, 等. 双额大骨瓣减压术联合小脑幕裂孔切开术治疗双侧大脑半球外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2013, 8(6):472-473.
12
邵雪非,武银刚,沈军, 等. 改良大骨瓣减压术治疗特重型创伤后急性弥漫性脑肿胀[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2014, 30(6):495-499.
13
岑明,陈伟峰,宋显兴, 等. 双侧额大骨瓣减压术在重型颅脑外伤致难治性弥漫性脑肿胀患者中的应用分析[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2014, 37(5):37-39.
14
Barmparas G,Singer M,Ley E, et al. Decreased intra-cranial pressure monitor use at level Ⅱ trauma centers is associated with increased mortality[J]. Am Surg, 2012, 78(10): 1166-1171.
15
李玉明,刘健,高方友, 等. 用改良双额颞大骨瓣减压术治疗外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2008, 17(5):540-542.
16
Bao YH,Liang YM,Gao GY, et al. Bilateral decomp-ressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2010, 27(2): 341-347.
17
张春雷,王玉海,蔡桑, 等. 外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀的临床分型及治疗[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(10):1054-1056.
18
高亮. 正确评价颅内压监测在重型创伤性颅脑损伤救治中的地位[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2013, 29(2):100-102.
19
O'Brien NF,Maa T,Reuter-Rice K. Noninvasive scr-eening for intracranial hypertension in children with acute, severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2015, 16(4): 420-425.
20
Bouzat P,Oddo M,Payen JF. Transcranial Doppler after traumatic brain injury: is there a role?[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2014, 20(2): 153-160.
21
景慎东,胡延霞,张继良, 等. TCD参数与颅脑损伤后颅内压关系的研究[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2009, 14(9):559-561.
22
辛志成,吴钟华,龙连圣, 等. 创伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀患者TCD参数与颅内压的相关性研究[J]. 海南医学, 2015, 26(21):3141-3143.
[1] 钱晓英, 吴新, 徐婷婷. 颅脑损伤并发呼吸衰竭患者早期机械通气的效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 526-528.
[2] 刘玲, 肖颖, 王蓉. 严重创伤并发肺部感染死亡病例分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 581-583.
[3] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[4] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[5] 王景景, 符锋, 李建伟, 任党利, 陈翀, 刘慧, 孙洪涛, 涂悦. 针刺对中型创伤性颅脑损伤后BDNF/TrkB信号通路的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 199-205.
[6] 张馨月, 韩帅, 张舒石, 李文臣, 张舒岩. 颅内压监测技术在创伤性颅脑损伤治疗中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 246-252.
[7] 王守森, 黄银兴, 陈宇晖, 胡晓芳, 刘海兵. 重型颅脑损伤的外科救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 190-192.
[8] 张永明. 颈段脊髓电刺激治疗颅脑损伤后慢性意识障碍的进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-134.
[9] 贾素英, 李倩, 郭姗姗. 创伤性颅脑损伤后血小板功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 180-185.
[10] 何佳伟, 张良, 杨骐, 王占祥. 创伤性颅脑损伤后进展性出血性损伤的诊疗现状[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 175-179.
[11] 王召, 田进杰, 郭朝, 王蕾, 严红燕, 冯素娟, 张毅. 血浆PGK1早期检测对创伤性颅脑损伤患者病情严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 154-159.
[12] 汤宏, 高灵, 高宁, 蒋俊文, 张吉坤, 李由, 陈伟明, 夏鹰. 控制性减压在治疗重型颅脑损伤中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 91-96.
[13] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[14] 王煜泽, 高文文, 杨磊, 赵海康. 无创监测技术在脑水肿应用的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 113-117.
[15] 丁晶, 李培雯, 许迎春. 醒脑开窍针刺法在神经急重症中的应用[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 161-164.
阅读次数
全文


摘要